I was pretty sure that there was no way such an honest and accomplished woman could be responsible for herself losing the election. I mean, she has accomplished SO MUCH! I mean there was .... uh, well ... never mind.
Hey, but at least she has never been responsible for any failures, and that holds right up to this past election. If there was ever anything the Clinton's were good at besides "I can't recall", it was "I wasn't responsible!"
"Hillary Clinton on Saturday cast blame for her surprise election loss on the announcement by the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, days before the election that he had revived the inquiry into her use of a private email server."
When you go through life not recalling and not being responsible, it is good that you have a foundation that hauls in $200 million a year, "Funds, for Clintons".
Mother Jones is a far left magazine, and the selections of what they print typically fit their slant People don't buy Mother Jones because they want "balanced reporting'.
So it takes exceptional courage, bordering on not caring about their own existence to publish the truth that there wasn't any "Whitelash".
To deny a popular meme of the left that allows their people to feel superior as they denigrate the country in order to denigrate "Trump voters" is simply amazing!
It seems that as the left picks themselves up off the floor, they have been forced for a moment to look around and ask "what hit us"? I'm pretty sure this self teaching moment won't last very long, but it is one of the serious advantages of being blind-sided!
if you have read my blog over the years, you have pretty much seen all of this, but NOT from the "Gray Lady" herself! Sometimes getting your ass kicked can cause you to look away from your navel for just a bit as it seems to have in this case.
Academia has a heavy bias against conservatives and Christians! Talk about "news at 11"!
Universities are the bedrock of progressive values, but the one kind of diversity that universities disregard is ideological and religious. We’re fine with people who don’t look like us, as long as they think like us.
O.K., that’s a little harsh. But consider George Yancey, a sociologist who is black and evangelical.
“Outside of academia I faced more problems as a black,” he told me. “But inside academia I face more problems as a Christian, and it is not even close.”
"As long as they think like us"? Well yes, that is harsh -- the university will TOTALLY embrace any whacked out idea of post-modernism, intersectional feminism, Afro-space alien studies, Zombie culture, etc, but it IS absolutely correct that it will reject "conservative Christian" like a turd in the punchbowl!
It’s also liberal poppycock that there aren’t smart conservatives or evangelicals. Richard Posner is a more-or-less conservative who is the most cited legal scholar of all time. With her experience and intellect, Condoleezza Rice would enhance any political science department. Francis Collins is an evangelical Christian and famed geneticist who has led the Human Genome Project and the National Institutes of Health. And if you’re saying that conservatives may be tolerable, but evangelical Christians aren’t — well, are you really saying you would have discriminated against the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.?
It's worth the read, and interesting to see the the left look away from their navels a bit while their head is spinning -- they will likely be right back to "lock the idiots all up" mode in a couple weeks!
Slightly long, but well worth it for all the information packed into this one.
Some snippets ...
To quote the great Iowahawk: "Trump is what happens when you spent the last 7 Thanksgiving dinners lecturing your angry uncle from your Vox index cards."
From Howie Carr:
“Have you noticed how many of the riff-raff can’t wait to go in front of the TV cameras to announce in broken English that the reason they hate President-elect Trump is because they’re illegal aliens.
Then they hold up their signs saying “NOT MY PRESIDENT!”
Well then, of course he’s not your president. You’re from Guatemala, or maybe Honduras.
Last night, as a public service to the viewing public, Fox News Channel started running English-language subtitles under the anti-Trump sound bites. I’m serious.”
Chosen at "random":
The Trans Pacific Pact seems to have died unborn. Mexico and Canada have expressed their willingness to renegotiate NAFTA, 1.4 million people who admitted they were here illegally and gave the government their names and addresses to apply for Obama’s Executive Order amnesty, have caught on that it’s not worth a dime and will be cancelled as soon as Trump takes office. Many are reported to be self-deporting themselves.
The punchline? Trump puts them on his team! Isn't that a hoot?
Naturally, the coverage on this will be minimal. Have you not heard? Trump is a homophobe, misogynist, and a racist.
How do we know that? Because TP takes words and makes their determination -- Thou shalt bow before the PC priesthood of TP, or thou shalt be labeled forever. Only the penance of joining with the beast of TP and begging forgiveness for your PC sins repeatedly might possibly return to being a "conditional pariah", but at least in Trump's case, I'm sure, not even that.
He is vermin -- his actions are meaningless. The great and all powerful TP has spoken.
But wait -- what if it actually ISN'T all powerful????
Adams predicted a Trump victory over a year ago when I predicted Trump to flame out quickly. When I see people who make correct predictions when I and pretty much everyone else is making totally inaccurate predictions, I listen to the guy that is correct -- HARD.
Earlier this week CNN.com listed 24 different theories that pundits have provided for why Trump won. And the list isn’t even complete. I’ve heard other explanations as well. What does it tell you when there are 24 different explanations for a thing.
It tells you that someone just dropped a cognitive dissonance cluster bomb on the public. Heads exploded. Cognitive dissonance set in. Weird theories came out. This is the cleanest and clearest example of cognitive dissonance you will ever see. Remember it.
Just read the whole article, it is short and ALL worth it. Here is how he ends.
As I often tell you, we all live in our own movies inside our heads. Humans did not evolve with the capability to understand their reality because it was not important to survival. Any illusion that keeps us alive long enough to procreate is good enough.
That’s why the protestors live in a movie in which they are fighting against a monster called Trump and you live in a movie where you got the president you wanted for the changes you prefer. Same planet, different realities.
I'll quibble with his evolution faith to say that I believe that we are spiritual beings living in what appears to be a physical world that is actually quantum. Our faith and our intent as a whole does much more to manifest our reality than physicalists (it's all matter) -- which we are all heavily trained to believe. Our "movie" (spirit) has more effect on what Adams sees to be "reality" than physicalists are willing to accept from my POV.
Nope ... not Trump on a made for TV entertainment venue -- actual liberal with real employees.
Reagan said of "liberals" that "They will defend your right to agree with them to their dying breath".
They are a bit less tolerant than that these days -- they don't want you around if you don't agree with them. You agree with them OR ELSE!
If they don't get their way, they believe that rioting, firing employees and cutting off friends and family that are not in lock-step with their views are all justified. Thou shalt have no other god before politics.
"Hating the haters is not hate" -- and they will define who the "haters are". Violence may well be justified, certainly firing an employee who disagrees, obviously refusing to talk to parents, siblings, friends, etc because of political disagreement is completely justified. Totalitarianism is unsurprisingly a TOTAL world view.
Politics "trumps all" -- God, family blood, years of friendship, neighbor proximity, EVERYTHING!
You simply MUST agree, or they will tack a long list of horrible labels on you -- and fire you at least, if not worse.
For non-totalitarians, this is very painful. Our list of priorities usually goes something like "God, family, self responsibility/care, friends, service to others, community (actual people in neighborhoods and churches), country, vocation/career, -- and THEN, somewhere around here, like near the bottom of the top 10, politics. Pets would rank higher for me.
I don't really understand the standard lefty priority, but it seems something like **ME**, followed by "you damned well better agree with me on MY politics!".
I suppose eventually the idea that those priorities are not "well rounded" will land me in the gulag or an unmarked ditch somewhere, but I just don't see putting either me or politics first -- under whatever penalty. My eternal soul "trumps" those earthly concerns.
One nice thing about having a blog is that you can go back and see yourself 8 years ago. Here I am from 2008.
Of course the media was GIDDY ... the opposite of now, no surprise there.
The markets dropped 400 points the day after the election -- ho hum, the media didn't care and did not attribute it to BO, but rather W.
Myself --- and pretty much everyone of conservative ilk wanted him to be successful. If I recall correctly, Limbaugh wanted him to fail to be able to GET HIS POLICIES, like BOcare through, because they would be damaging -- they were, and the rising prices under BOcare were part of what elected Trump.
I don't go into in the post below, the only thing we really knew that BO was going to do FOR SURE was close Gitmo on day one and end the useless wars. Gitmo is still open, the troops are still in Afghanistan, and of course he both did and did not end the Iraq war. Beyond that, all we really knew was "hope and change" -- but the press knew it would be grand!
We know that deficits will become huge issues again, any troops killed will be headline news once more, homelessness will likely return, and any problem anywhere in the world will instantly be Trumps fault. Oh, any thought of blaming anything on BO will or course be a non-starter -- my guess is that W is FINALLY off the hook for being responsible for all badness!
Oh, and I bet "Fillibuster" isn't "obstructionist" anymore!
Trump is the new daemon!
Happy Days, Hail BO!
It is fun to watch the media enjoy the Obama victory. I couldn't help but wonder if Colin Powell had ever run as a Republican and won, what kind of attitude would the MSM have had? I suspect it would have been a long way from the unadultrated joy they were able to feel today. They would have found it "ironic" that the first black elected was a Republican, although Lincoln and the Republican party risked it all to fight the Civil War and the Democrats presided over Jim Crow and all the lynching for 100 years. A KKK recruiter (Robert Byrd) still sits in the Senate today, however, to the MSM, it would be "ironic" if a black Republican had been the first elected!
The reality of a 400+ point Dow sell-off the day after the election was little reported. Perhaps investors didn't get the memo of how good BO is going to be for the economy?
I was glad to not hear of any conservatives thinking they would leave the country because he was elected, nor really very little in the way of ill will at all. A far cry from the attitude of a Paul Wellstone that refused to shake VP Dan Quayle's hand at a Washington function. I hope all conservatives are civil, and I expect them to generally be.
In the unlikely event that my little blog ever got famous, I'd give up the BO schtick over the President. The main reason I do it is a lot like Rush Limbaugh poking fun at how the MSM treats Republicans every day. "Dubya", "Ronnie Raygun", "Shrub", "F*** Bush", etc. BO would not want to be "BHO" since it is considered an "affront" to use his middle name. I wonder if Chief Justice Roberts will be able to say "Hussein" when he swears him in? Potentially he will have to change back to his real name "Barry Sottero" which he had for most of his childhood. Then he would be "BS", which may end up being more appropriate.
Why do conservatives tend to wish the new president well even though we suspect he will declare war on all that makes America exceptional? Simply because we are usually Christians first, Family people 2nd and Americans 3rd ... with a close 4th being some sort of profession or career that serves both our country and provides the finances so we can be responsible for ourselves and contributing members of society. Our fervent hope is that Obama and the Democrats will be successful in getting the economy growing again, even though every piece of evidence we see says that they will not be.
It is fun to watch the media. They are positively giddy. I remember so well '92 when they were beside themselves with the pure joy of a Clinton election and a Democrat majority in both houses of congress, but this is even better. I suspect it harkens back to '64 when LBJ whacked Goldwater.
How different from when I turned on NPR the morning after the '94 election and they were playing Johnny Cash ... I didn't really need to hear the results to know what happened! They were on the verge of tears -- and there was positive fear that the evil Newt Gingrich was to be Speaker of the House!
Gee, I wonder if the "sanctity of the fillibuster" might kind of change now? Remember how HORRIBLE it was that Republicans were talking about "the nuclear option" for appointments? I 'm sure the "unbiased" MSM will be 100% supportive of a Republican fillibuster now! Kind of like how big an issue campaign finance was this year. NOT!
Oh well, being in the opposition is kind of fun. Now Saint BO will need to actually deliver on some of his brilliance--that is often a bit harder than reading a teleprompter smoothly!
I have as hard a time getting angry over a diatribe like this as I do getting angry at a 2 year old melting down. The election didn't go their way, so it is time for a tantrum. It's way to long -- he may just as well have listed a long list of noxious names to call the majority that voted for Trump (and it does look like it will be a popular vote majority as well as an electoral one at this point). This paragraph is a sample.
All along, Trump seemed like a twisted caricature of every rotten reflex of the radical right. That he has prevailed, that he has won this election, is a crushing blow to the spirit; it is an event that will likely cast the country into a period of economic, political, and social uncertainty that we cannot yet imagine. That the electorate has, in its plurality, decided to live in Trump’s world of vanity, hate, arrogance, untruth, and recklessness, his disdain for democratic norms, is a fact that will lead, inevitably, to all manner of national decline and suffering.
It is such an echo of Reagan, here was the WaPo in 1980:
“Something of gigantic proportions happened—must have been happening for a long while—and the capital and the political wise men were taken by surprise. . . an ‘anti-Washington,’ ‘anti-establishment’ political storm warning was missed by Washington and the establishment.”
Ya think? Not that the elites were likely to pay any attention then -- or obviously in the intervening years. They live in a blue bubble and they listen to themselves talk about "bitter clingers", "fly-over country", "deplorables", "Bible thumping racist rubes", etc, etc.
They know they want to remove the right of such people to vote -- or just replace them with "undocumented Democrats", but in the 36 years since Reagan, their only lament is that those damned unwashed masses are still out there!
So they have a tantrum -- and riot. Because being two years old forever is all they know.
Hayward sums up what brought us Trump in one brilliant line:
"Elections no longer change the character of our government."
The reason for this is the Administrative State, the subject of a big book I'm slogging through:
The premise of the Constitution is that the people should rule. The premise of the administrative state, explicitly expressed by Woodrow Wilson and other Progressive-era theorists, is that experts should rule, in a new administrative form largely sealed off from political influence, i.e., sealed off from the people. At some point, it amounts to government without the consent of the governed, a simple fact that surprisingly few conservative politicians perceive. Ronald Reagan was, naturally, a conspicuous exception, noting in 1981 in his first Inaugural Address, “It is time to check and reverse the growth of government, which shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the governed.”
The problem is that even Reagan was unable to actually reduce the size of government (he only slowed the rate of growth). If Trump wants to change the character of our government, Scott Walker needs to go to Washington. The unelected Democrat union controlled administrative state MUST be brought under control, or this will be yet another election that doesn't change the character of government.
The other prong of attack to return to some semblance of freedom has already been strongly begun by Trump -- we must take back our history!
Post-modern intellectuals have pronounced their historical judgment on America’s past, finding it to be morally indefensible. Every great human achievement of the past—whether in philosophy, religion, literature, or the humanities—came to be understood as a kind of exploitation of the powerless. Rather than allowing the past to be viewed in terms of its aspirations and accomplishments, it has been judged by its failures. The living part of the past is understood in terms slavery, racism, and identity politics. Political correctness arose as the practical and necessary means of enforcing this historical judgment. No public defense of past greatness could be allowed to live in the present. Public morality and public policy would come to be understood in terms of the formerly oppressed.
BOistan is like a person in recovery from addiction or mental illness. We need to embrace our past as our past, imperfect, but OURS, which includes both strengths and weaknesses -- we need to focus on WHAT'S STRONG vs what's wrong! Attempting to punish ourselves in the present for the past while ignoring the strengths of that country we killed called America is hurting all of us!
Here is how the excellent linked article puts it:
More than just a rebuke to political correctness and identity politics, a Trump victory would be, in their eyes, a vehicle for reasserting the sovereignty of the people and withdrawal of consent for the administrative state and the suffocating boundaries of acceptable opinion backing it up. A large number of Americans have responded positively to Trump’s slogan “Make America Great Again” because they too see Trump as a forceful tribune against the slow-motion desiccation of the country under the steady advance of liberalism.
So you have committed a felony, you have come to the US illegally, should you feel safe?
Dreamers like Quiñonez, who essentially outed themselves as undocumented, could see their protections stripped. ICE raids on factories and construction sites could begin anew. “And I certainly think we’re going to see some wall-building,” Martin said.
BO said yes, Trump says no. Why is it again that we have elections at all? BO doesn't think the Constitution matters, even though he took an oath to defend it
Do elections matter? BO once thought they did -- but the WaPo apparently doesn't agree with him today.
Does that mean that they consider the one:, the all powerful BO to be ... dare I say it, WRONG???
Satan is "the accuser" -- he abhors actual freedom. He seeks to enslave the soul to constantly justify itself -- to "pull itself up by it's own bootstraps", thus becoming ever more lost.
Here, in this instance of profound hypocrisy, began the idea of America as a victimizing nation. And then came the inevitable corollary: the nation’s moral indebtedness to its former victims: blacks especially but all other put-upon peoples as well.
This indebtedness became a cultural imperative, what Styron might call a “transforming circumstance.” Today America must honor this indebtedness or lose much of its moral authority and legitimacy as a democracy. America must show itself redeemed of its oppressive past.
America was founded on ideas -- and VALUES, the highest in the the history of the world save those of Jesus. Indeed, it was founded on the values of Christ -- that ALL were equally endowed with the opportunity for redemption.
But America was a human creation -- like the Church. It was imperfect, and in the eyes of Satan and his followers, imperfection means you are NOT redeemed! You are a hypocrite for claiming high values but failing to live up to them fully! Thus you stand ACCUSED, unless you abandon your values.
So imperfection is to be accused and held against all who fail to follow the Satanic authority. The only hope for redemption is WORKS!
How to do this? In a word: deference. Since the 1960s, when America finally became fully accountable for its past, deference toward all groups with any claim to past or present victimization became mandatory. The Great Society and the War on Poverty were some of the first truly deferential policies. Since then deference has become an almost universal marker of simple human decency that asserts one’s innocence of the American past. Deference is, above all else, an apology.
This is a very good policy if you can set yourself up as the arbiter of proper deference -- as the left wing culture increasingly has. The greater the need to pay deference (penance), the greater their power -- thus a never ending stream from women to blacks to gays to transgenders to Muslims to ???. It is like the Scribes and Pharisees or the pre-Reformation Catholic Church -- being under the law of PC is a gift that keeps on giving to the ruling elite who defines what is and is not proper penance.
Since the ’60s the Democratic Party, and liberalism generally, have thrived on the power of deference. When Hillary Clinton speaks of a “basket of deplorables,“ she follows with a basket of isms and phobias—racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia and Islamaphobia. Each ism and phobia is an opportunity for her to show deference toward a victimized group and to cast herself as America’s redeemer. And, by implication, conservatism is bereft of deference.Donald Trump supporters are cast as small grudging people, as haters who blindly love America and long for its exclusionary past. Against this she is the very archetype of American redemption. The term “progressive” is code for redemption from a hate-driven America.
The problem with works driven redemption is that it creates it's own form of power structure, a "priesthood" if you will that decides on "the redeemed". So the priests of PC tell us that in order to "atone for the sins of America", we must live in slavery to political correctness, and they will define who is and is not "redeemed" -- but we don't like it. The part built into our souls that yearns for Christ, grace, and true freedom knows that we are being misled.
Deference has been codified in American life as political correctness. And political correctness functions like a despotic regime. It is an oppressiveness that spreads its edicts further and further into the crevices of everyday life. We resent it, yet for the most part we at least tolerate its demands. But it means that we live in a society that is ever willing to cast judgment on us, to shame us in the name of a politics we don’t really believe in. It means our decency requires a degree of self-betrayal.
But self-betrayal is not freedom, and worse, it instills the "soft bigotry of low expectations" against many groups in our nation -- FOREVER. We rob other humans of their personal power with our conviction that we must "fix them" to redeem ourselves, and the elite are happy to sell us indulgences and pad their "foundations".
After all, the problem with deference is that it is never more than superficial. We are polite. We don’t offend. But we don’t ever transform people either. Out of deference we refuse to ask those we seek to help to be primarily responsible for their own advancement. Yet only this level of responsibility transforms people, no matter past or even present injustice. Some 3,000 shootings in Chicago this year alone is the result of deference camouflaging a lapse of personal responsibility with empty claims of systemic racism.
The BRIGHTEST item in Trumps acceptance speech was that he seeks to "invest in the inner cities". **IF** he were able to bring back some of the trillions parked overseas due to our high corporate taxes, invest in our inner cites and allow them to regain their personal power as full responsible citizens, he has the chance to improbably become the greatest president since Reagan -- or even greater. I agree this a BIG "if", but it IS possible!
Societies, like individuals, have intuitions. Donald Trump is an intuition. At least on the level of symbol, maybe he would push back against the hegemony of deference—if not as a liberator then possibly as a reformer. Possibly he could lift the word responsibility out of its somnambulant stigmatization as a judgmental and bigoted request to make of people. This, added to a fundamental respect for the capacity of people to lift themselves up, could go a long way toward a fairer and better America.
The priesthood of PC took a major hit last night -- let's pray that the tide can be turned!
I use BSOD because you have probably seen more than one on your Windows box -- typically MANY more.
On the S/38, AS/400, IBM i that I worked on, a good many people NEVER saw what we called a "machine check", and even most of them that did saw one "a time or two a year".
BUT ... sometimes there were machines that had issues, and badness came in numbers -- we would fix one problem, but another would be hit, and it looked THE SAME! Of course it did, the machine stopped cold with a red light on the console and it took a LONG recovery to get it back up.
So too especially Democrat rhetoric, for politics -- EVERY Republican nominee since at least Goldwater has been "Crazy, Dangerous, Racist ... "like Hitler". Ho hum.
National Review is in the "Never Trump" camp -- they would prefer Hildebeast to Donald because they are rather wired into the beltway and rather like the status quo. But at least they see that when you scream "clear and present danger" since 1964, including in 1980, and the world not only doesn't explode, but the economy grows and the USSR actually DOES go away, well, your credibility may be quite strained.
So maybe Trump really is "Hitler", but after BO, I'm more than ready to take my chances in case he pulls it out!
At least not if you find 70-80% of the population believing the same thing and care what 70-80% of your fellow BOistanis think.
70% of people believe that BOistan is in decline, 84% think the elites play by different rules, and a strong majority feels their kids will be less well off than they are.
"First, the American people believe that the country is not only on the wrong track but almost 70 percent say that America is in actual decline. The concept of decline is antithetical to the American experience.
Second, for more than three centuries, the animating moral obligation of America has been the self-imposed obligation that each generation passes on to its children a better America than they themselves inherited. This is what makes us Americans. In Armada’s polling we found that a majority of Americans believe that they are better off than their parents were. But a great majority says that THEIR children will be worse off than they themselves are today. This is the crisis of the American Dream. And it is no surprise that a majority of Americans agree that if we leave the next generation “worse off” that there will still be a place called “the United States” but there will no longer be an “America.”
Third, when asked whether or not everyone in America plays by the same rules to get ahead or are there different rules for well-connected and people with money, a staggering 84 percent of voters picked the latter. Only 10 percent believed that everyone has an equal opportunity."
The early voting looks like Trump may be the pick and all the pundits will be wrong -- as Caddell said:
The question on the table now is: could 2016 be the second such election? If it is, it won’t be for Hillary Clinton.
The elites don't report this because they don't really care that 70% of the "idiot common people" think that their country is in decline -- the elites are doing great, and they want to keep it going JUST LIKE IT IS!
What we have been looking at is a nation through a media kaleidoscope. If Trump wins, we MAY get even some of the hypnotized to see the reality of the destruction that BO wrought.
The top 1-5% have manipulated and purchased close to 50% of the public to believe that they have no personal power and must be dependent on the state -- while the top 1-5% take ever larger rewards for their "largesse" with the money of the top 50-95%.
Are 70 and 80% of the people less brainwashed than the elites believe? We will soon know, but the answer won't be a complete surprise to some of us if it goes against the elites.
As I cast my vote for Trump today I thought back to 1976 when I voted for Jimmy Carter. I was completely confident then -- my family always voted Democrat, I had been schooled to vote Democrat and pretty much everyone on campus voted Democrat. Let's face it, unless you were filthy rich or some sort of a knuckle dragger, why would you ever vote any other way? Nixon was evil -- he was only voted in because Johnson was a warmonger. He lied -- US presidents didn't lie then, it was an impeachable offense.
Then, on March 18th, 1977, Jimmuh spoke of "The Moral Equivalent of War" (MEOW) and I bought a cat and started reading National Review. You see, the "greatest challenge since WWII" wasn't warming then -- it was the FACT that the planet was OUT OF OIL. Only idiots believed otherwise.
By 1980 I was firmly resolved to vote for a MADMAN -- Ronald Reagan, a one of least intelligent people that ever lived (Carter was a certified genius) that considered the USSR to be an evil empire that could be defeated. The idiocy of Reagan and his "totally misled or evil" followers was a danger to the entire world. The "Doomsday Clock" ticked closer to midnight. Reagan was a complete embarrassment -- a foolish actor, a mere marionette to powerful interests that would destroy the economy and likely our very lives!
I was a lot less confident then, but I cared.
Fast forward 40 years to this AM. If someone would have told me that 40 years later I would be voting for another Republican candidate, almost as maligned as Reagan was back then, I would have asked what kind of weed he was smoking. (back then weed was illegal) In 1980, we actually still believed in amendments to the Constitution -- the Equal Rights Amendment didn't time out until 1982 -- probably the point where "The Party" (TP-D) decided that they were going to use the SCOTUS to make whatever wholesale changes they wanted without any more amendment attempts.
America was still a great country -- people worked, we flew in space -- even to the moon. We believed our children's lives would be better than ours. We revered God, American History, and I think a strong majority even believed that truthfulness, rule of law, the Constitution, hard work, personal responsibility and independence were good things. Character was important for even the common man -- demanded for leaders. The idea of a "government handout" was considered to be justifiably stigmatized -- you worked for what you had, and if you couldn't afford it, you didn't get it.
Sure, the 30's and the 60's plus Roe V Wade had injected some serious poison into the American system, but I don't think any of us thought that America would perish in our lifetimes -- let alone less than 40 years later.
I expect Hillary to win tonight, but I'm not really watching -- I'll go to bed early and the answer will either be done or not by the AM. I stayed up all night for Bush vs Gore -- lot of good THAT did me!
We know that Hillary will "bring the country together" -- the question is just how much force she will use.
If by some miracle Trump beats the rigged system, I have no expectations. I sincerely doubt he will accomplish all that much, but potentially the movement he muddled into will bring the spirit of the Tea Party back to life and there will at least be a discussion about some semblance of rule of law, fiscal responsibility, incentives to work and grow and yes, some small measure of control of our borders. 70% of the population sees the country as in decline -- if he could move that number up to only 60% that would be a very credible presidency. Optimism used to be one of the hallmarks of America -- heck, if he got to only 60% I might think there was a chance that we could get back to over half of the country feeling we were moving forward!
I leave you with this parting video that I don't believe because this is a cynical time. It does make me wonder however -- if such a video could have been manufactured for one honest life that Hildebeast had touched, does anyone really think it would not have been and every one of us would know the story?
The fact that it exists at all about Trump and we have not read a story of how it is "all fake, lies, disgusting, etc" is at least intriguing. I certainly understand why I have not seen it other than having it pointed out to me on YouTube if it is true.
Could it be true? If there was anything remotely this touching about Hildebeast, would we not ALL be so sick of the story we would be ready to barf? Think about it.
