In April I replaced my 15 year old trolling motor with a Minn Kota Terrova with 80lbs thrust, powerdrive and I thought a neat feature called Autopilot that would allow me to put it on a course and the motor would automatically adjust for wind and current. I say "I thought", because the autopilot "didn't work". I was out fishing with the boat twice, and figured that since the motor was under warranty anyway it didn't make much difference when I took it in.
Oops ... somehow I got the wrong model that had all the buttons at lights for autopilot on it, but didn't have it enabled. BUT, even though it has been close to 90 days since I bought it, Cabela's had NO PROBLEM just allowing the return and letting me upgrade to the model with Autopilot.
I always knew I loved that store, now they have an even more loyal customer!
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Monday, July 09, 2007
Human Nature
|
Friday, July 06, 2007
Benjamin Franklin: An American Life
I'm behind in my book reports, and this book has to be passed on for my son to read, so no more procrastination! My rediscovery of reading history continues to be enjoyable thanks to this book by Walter Issacson. An American icon comes to life in a solidly researched and written book that shows the human side of Franklin, but doesn't try to bring down the guy that edited Jefferson on the Declaration of Independence from "We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable" to "we hold these truths to be self-evident". Through the magic of the internet you can see it here. That is an example of a historic edit!
Franklin was the best known American of his day and one of the best known scientists in the world as well. His work with electricity was groundbreaking, but possibly more important he was a practical tinkerer and experimenter much as Edison subsequently was that sought to apply his brilliance to matters of utility rather than theory. lightning rods to save buildings, bifocals, better stoves, printing improvements and many other little inventions.
Franklin was the solid champion of "the middling people", really the very founder of the idea of the American Middle Class and the concept of upward mobility. Sometimes referred to in jest as "America's first Yuppie"--kind of funny that it took until the Ronald Reagan '80s for that term to be created. The elites have always hated the idea that the common man could better themselves and be upwardly mobile. Ben believed that self improvement was possible through education, self discipline, and hard work.. In those times of rigid class and nobility, the idea that "anyone could improve their selff" was cutting edge thinking. Although still very much aware of the dangers of "rabble rule", Franklin was much more of a believer in democracy than the rest of the founding fathers. He is the only founding father to have been involved in and a signer to all four of the founding documents: The Declaration of Independence, the treaty with France, treaty with England, and The Constitution. He worked closely with Jefferson and Adams in France, and when the new nation was meeting in Philadelphia, under the mulberry tree at his home was a common informal meeting place.
Many great businessmen including Thomas Mellon and Andrew Carnegie found inspiration in the maxims of frugality and hard work that both Ben and his literary creation "Poor Richard" described.. Franklin is often thought of as the father of the self-help movement. Four of his written rules of conduct included:
). Frugality
2. Truthfulness
3. Industriousness
4. Speak ill of no man
He did very well with 1 and 3, is pretty solid on 2, and like anyone, struggled with 4--and the issue
Franklin's favorite theme--"slow and steady diligence is the way to wealth". Is anathema to the left, because such thought makes both success and poverty significantly in the domain of "individual responsibility", a concept they find completely odius. Worse, it would indicate that there is the potential of virtue as opposed to only corruption in an earned dollar. The only kind of wealth that the left tends to like is that which is inherited--or in the case of John Kerry, married into.
His view on social engineering is summarized by: "Whenever we attempt to mend the scheme of providence we need to be very circumspect lest we do more harm than good."
He was a master of the simple yet elegant maxim. Most of them were heavily borrowed from even more ancient statements, but the following are attributed to him--some much more famous than others:
"A penny saved is a penny earned"
"Haste makes waste"
"Early to bed early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise"
"Half the truth is often a great lie"
"Genius without education is like silver in the mine"
"There's more old drunkards than old doctors"
"He's a fool than cannot conceal his wisdom"
"Nothing can be said to be certain except death and taxes"
At one point in his life Franklin put the following goals for a worthy life to paper and is said to have attempted to follow these rules during his life:
1 Temperance - Eat not to dullness, drink not to elevation
2 Silence: Speak not but what may benefit others or yourself; avoid trifling conversation
3 Order: Let all your things have their places; let each part of your business have it's time
4 Resolution: Resolve to perform what you ought; perform without fail what you resolve
5 Frugality: Make no expense but to do good to yourself or others (ie. waste nothing)
6 Industry: Lose no time; be always employed in something useful, cut off all unnecessary actions
7 Sincerity:Use no hurtful deceit, think innocently and justly and if you speak, speak accordingly
8 Justice: Wrong none by doing injury or by omitting thne benefits that are your duty
9 Moderation: Avoid extremes, forbare resenting injuries so much as you think they deserve
10 Cleanliness: Tolerate no no uncleanliness in body clothes or habituation
11 Tranquility: Be not disturbed at trifles , or at accidents common or unavoidable
12 Chastity: Rarely use venery but for health or offspring; never to dullness, weakness, or the injury of another's peace or reputation.
A friend suggested that he missed "humility", which Franklin agreed with, so added a 13th virtue. He was quite libertine sexually for the time and fathered a son out of wedlock that he did care for. He tended to befriend and was certainly flirtatious with much younger women. He tended to treat their intellectual curiosity seriously and assist in their education. No doubt having one of the worlds foremost scientists paying intellectual attention to a young lady was very unusual in the day, interesting to the young lady, and no doubt the cause of plenty of disucssions about "reasons". (at the time, the intellectual development of women wasn't considered a high priority).
There is a lot of "conjecture" of course about "how far the relationships went", but I have a lot more patience for Franklin than say Billy C for a few reasons:
a). He didn't support or sign any sexual harassment law
b). None of the women were in his employ
c). He seemed to actually care about them, and they about him for decades -- many letters. Yes, a few flirtatious in content, but far from pornographic, and the most of them interested in their lives, studies, thoughts, etc.
Is that a "double standard"? I'd claim it as having some standards as opposed to none. Those that would lump Ben in with a Kennedy or a Clinton because he seemed to "like women a little too much" are well on the way to no standards at all. There is no evidence that Clinton cared one whit for the women he was involved with beyond his sexual gratification. I do hold him in higher regard than Kennedy, although Clinton may have raped one, he didn't kill any. There is reasonable evidence that Franklin's relationships were chaste and positive for both parties and that the rumors to the contrary are based on the acknowledged fact that he did father a child out of wedlock prior to marriage, and some cases of "opportunity" with some of the young ladies whose company he obviously enjoyed. Being a family man was certainly not Franklin's strong suit, but it seems that much of his reputation may have been based on what today we would applaud as "affirmative action" for young intelligent women.
The book is well worth the time to read. I found a lot to love about old Ben, and will look forward to the opportunity to learn more about him in the future.
Franklin was the best known American of his day and one of the best known scientists in the world as well. His work with electricity was groundbreaking, but possibly more important he was a practical tinkerer and experimenter much as Edison subsequently was that sought to apply his brilliance to matters of utility rather than theory. lightning rods to save buildings, bifocals, better stoves, printing improvements and many other little inventions.
Franklin was the solid champion of "the middling people", really the very founder of the idea of the American Middle Class and the concept of upward mobility. Sometimes referred to in jest as "America's first Yuppie"--kind of funny that it took until the Ronald Reagan '80s for that term to be created. The elites have always hated the idea that the common man could better themselves and be upwardly mobile. Ben believed that self improvement was possible through education, self discipline, and hard work.. In those times of rigid class and nobility, the idea that "anyone could improve their selff" was cutting edge thinking. Although still very much aware of the dangers of "rabble rule", Franklin was much more of a believer in democracy than the rest of the founding fathers. He is the only founding father to have been involved in and a signer to all four of the founding documents: The Declaration of Independence, the treaty with France, treaty with England, and The Constitution. He worked closely with Jefferson and Adams in France, and when the new nation was meeting in Philadelphia, under the mulberry tree at his home was a common informal meeting place.
Many great businessmen including Thomas Mellon and Andrew Carnegie found inspiration in the maxims of frugality and hard work that both Ben and his literary creation "Poor Richard" described.. Franklin is often thought of as the father of the self-help movement. Four of his written rules of conduct included:
). Frugality
2. Truthfulness
3. Industriousness
4. Speak ill of no man
He did very well with 1 and 3, is pretty solid on 2, and like anyone, struggled with 4--and the issue
Franklin's favorite theme--"slow and steady diligence is the way to wealth". Is anathema to the left, because such thought makes both success and poverty significantly in the domain of "individual responsibility", a concept they find completely odius. Worse, it would indicate that there is the potential of virtue as opposed to only corruption in an earned dollar. The only kind of wealth that the left tends to like is that which is inherited--or in the case of John Kerry, married into.
His view on social engineering is summarized by: "Whenever we attempt to mend the scheme of providence we need to be very circumspect lest we do more harm than good."
He was a master of the simple yet elegant maxim. Most of them were heavily borrowed from even more ancient statements, but the following are attributed to him--some much more famous than others:
"A penny saved is a penny earned"
"Haste makes waste"
"Early to bed early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise"
"Half the truth is often a great lie"
"Genius without education is like silver in the mine"
"There's more old drunkards than old doctors"
"He's a fool than cannot conceal his wisdom"
"Nothing can be said to be certain except death and taxes"
At one point in his life Franklin put the following goals for a worthy life to paper and is said to have attempted to follow these rules during his life:
1 Temperance - Eat not to dullness, drink not to elevation
2 Silence: Speak not but what may benefit others or yourself; avoid trifling conversation
3 Order: Let all your things have their places; let each part of your business have it's time
4 Resolution: Resolve to perform what you ought; perform without fail what you resolve
5 Frugality: Make no expense but to do good to yourself or others (ie. waste nothing)
6 Industry: Lose no time; be always employed in something useful, cut off all unnecessary actions
7 Sincerity:Use no hurtful deceit, think innocently and justly and if you speak, speak accordingly
8 Justice: Wrong none by doing injury or by omitting thne benefits that are your duty
9 Moderation: Avoid extremes, forbare resenting injuries so much as you think they deserve
10 Cleanliness: Tolerate no no uncleanliness in body clothes or habituation
11 Tranquility: Be not disturbed at trifles , or at accidents common or unavoidable
12 Chastity: Rarely use venery but for health or offspring; never to dullness, weakness, or the injury of another's peace or reputation.
A friend suggested that he missed "humility", which Franklin agreed with, so added a 13th virtue. He was quite libertine sexually for the time and fathered a son out of wedlock that he did care for. He tended to befriend and was certainly flirtatious with much younger women. He tended to treat their intellectual curiosity seriously and assist in their education. No doubt having one of the worlds foremost scientists paying intellectual attention to a young lady was very unusual in the day, interesting to the young lady, and no doubt the cause of plenty of disucssions about "reasons". (at the time, the intellectual development of women wasn't considered a high priority).
There is a lot of "conjecture" of course about "how far the relationships went", but I have a lot more patience for Franklin than say Billy C for a few reasons:
a). He didn't support or sign any sexual harassment law
b). None of the women were in his employ
c). He seemed to actually care about them, and they about him for decades -- many letters. Yes, a few flirtatious in content, but far from pornographic, and the most of them interested in their lives, studies, thoughts, etc.
Is that a "double standard"? I'd claim it as having some standards as opposed to none. Those that would lump Ben in with a Kennedy or a Clinton because he seemed to "like women a little too much" are well on the way to no standards at all. There is no evidence that Clinton cared one whit for the women he was involved with beyond his sexual gratification. I do hold him in higher regard than Kennedy, although Clinton may have raped one, he didn't kill any. There is reasonable evidence that Franklin's relationships were chaste and positive for both parties and that the rumors to the contrary are based on the acknowledged fact that he did father a child out of wedlock prior to marriage, and some cases of "opportunity" with some of the young ladies whose company he obviously enjoyed. Being a family man was certainly not Franklin's strong suit, but it seems that much of his reputation may have been based on what today we would applaud as "affirmative action" for young intelligent women.
The book is well worth the time to read. I found a lot to love about old Ben, and will look forward to the opportunity to learn more about him in the future.
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
The Police and Fireworks
Blog posting has been slow. We are on "vacation" this week, so there was the sprint at work to get ready for some time off combined with great weather, followed by a home sprint to get the deck power washed and stained, the driveway power washed and sealed, along with a couple parties, workouts and a little time to go see Ratatouille (a really fun little movie that I'll hopefully post on later).
Tuesday night the 3rd the whole family got to go up to St Paul to see "The Police" in concert at Excel Energy Center. Great venue for a rock concert and it was full of a lot of screaming fans. Here is a detailed review of when they were in Dallas for those interested. The factual stuff in the review of dates, songs played, etc are pretty much the same. The order was mixed a bit, but they made it through all the hits, there were some different arrangements, but I had no complaints. Sting and Stuart Copeland the drummer looked especially good and high energy. Andy Summers is maybe showing his age a bit more, but then WHO AM I TO TALK!!! Being there brought back some of the early '80s, and it was pretty cool to be there with a 15 and 19 year old Son that loved the music as well. Given good enough earplugs, even my wife enjoyed it.
I'm not a giant rock or certainly rock concert fan, but I enjoy the experience from time to time, and it is a great spot to observe people and see technology interact with art and the masses. It is very hard to beat a modern rock stage set, jumbotrons, and industrial grade amplification for allowing 3 people to impact 10's of thousands of people (like 10K in the St Paul case) in a live situation. Is it a great use of all that power, technology, money, etc? From an intellectual POV, of course not, but "Man does not live by bread alone"--experience is part of our existence as well.
Do I agree with anything close to every idea expressed by The Police? Of course not, but I'm not out to have labels along the line of fundamentalist, ideologue, pharisee, moralist, etc applied to my life. "Being in the world, not of it" is one of those classic admonishments that shows the true degree of difficulty of the Christian life. It is pretty easy to be "one or the other". A moralist for whom all activity is cut and dried and known, or a libertine who is simply "not under any law".
There is an immense connection between Christ and the US that is not often called out, but the combination of Rock Concerts and Fireworks provide a unique opportunity to do the mapping. In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville does a good job of pointing out the dangers of "the Nanny State", which could just as easily be applied to the Nanny Religion:
Here we live in a country where our founding fathers gave us the immeasurable gift of freedom; yet many would seek to nibble at those freedoms in everything from fireworks bans, trans-fat bans, smoking bans, regulation of political speech through campaign finance laws, higher taxes, and even "fairness doctrines" to decide who can present what speech--because apparently "the Nanny" feels that we are incapable of the independence of America.
Likewise, an infinite God died on the cross to free us from sin AND the Law! Many would choose however to create "a new law" to enslave Christians even more deeply in some set of human created morality. The Devil is indeed in the details, and he is more than willing to help us ensnare ourselves in any number of "good rules".
So does that make me a Libertarian for whom there are no rules? Of course not. Christianity and America both recognize that the road has two ditches. "In the world NOT of it". Freedom applies HUGE responsibility on the individual. To be both considerate and tolerant--2nd hand smoke providing a great example. MUST the STATE tell us how it must be done? Have a free people really lost the ability to interact civilly at the level where the mix of "toleration and consideration" can work successfully? Apparently so.
For Americans and especially Christian Americans, the 4th is a good time to reflect on the issue of Freedom. It absolutely is never free--often that means that blood is required to maintain it, but more subtlety, it means that vigilance at every level is needed. We need to stay out of BOTH ditches--fireworks laws that don't allow sparklers, or "anything goes" with the general public firing up 16" mortars? Seems like moderation is required. The road is often slippery and narrow and the ditches on both sides are far to easy to skid into.
Tuesday night the 3rd the whole family got to go up to St Paul to see "The Police" in concert at Excel Energy Center. Great venue for a rock concert and it was full of a lot of screaming fans. Here is a detailed review of when they were in Dallas for those interested. The factual stuff in the review of dates, songs played, etc are pretty much the same. The order was mixed a bit, but they made it through all the hits, there were some different arrangements, but I had no complaints. Sting and Stuart Copeland the drummer looked especially good and high energy. Andy Summers is maybe showing his age a bit more, but then WHO AM I TO TALK!!! Being there brought back some of the early '80s, and it was pretty cool to be there with a 15 and 19 year old Son that loved the music as well. Given good enough earplugs, even my wife enjoyed it.
I'm not a giant rock or certainly rock concert fan, but I enjoy the experience from time to time, and it is a great spot to observe people and see technology interact with art and the masses. It is very hard to beat a modern rock stage set, jumbotrons, and industrial grade amplification for allowing 3 people to impact 10's of thousands of people (like 10K in the St Paul case) in a live situation. Is it a great use of all that power, technology, money, etc? From an intellectual POV, of course not, but "Man does not live by bread alone"--experience is part of our existence as well.
Do I agree with anything close to every idea expressed by The Police? Of course not, but I'm not out to have labels along the line of fundamentalist, ideologue, pharisee, moralist, etc applied to my life. "Being in the world, not of it" is one of those classic admonishments that shows the true degree of difficulty of the Christian life. It is pretty easy to be "one or the other". A moralist for whom all activity is cut and dried and known, or a libertine who is simply "not under any law".
There is an immense connection between Christ and the US that is not often called out, but the combination of Rock Concerts and Fireworks provide a unique opportunity to do the mapping. In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville does a good job of pointing out the dangers of "the Nanny State", which could just as easily be applied to the Nanny Religion:
Above these [citizens] an immense tutelary power is elevated, which alone takes charge of assuring their enjoyments and watching over their fate. It is absolute, detailed, far-seeing, and mild. It would resemble paternal power if, like that, it had for its object to prepare men for manhood; but on the contrary, it seeks only to keep them fixed irrevocably in childhood; it likes citizens to enjoy themselves provided that they think only of enjoying themselves. It willingly works for their happiness; but it wants to be the unique agent and sole arbiter of that; it provides for their security, foresees and secures their needs, facilitates their pleasures, conducts their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their estates, divides their inheritances; can it not take away from them entirely the trouble of thinking and the pain of living?I grew up in a "Nanny Church" that ignored the freedom provided by Christ and attempted to make decisions on alcohol, smoking, movies, television, music and even dancing. Unfortunately, like all such churches it seemed to never realize that eating too much and exercising too little was just as harmful and maybe more so than drinking and smoking, so that area of my life is doomed to require more in the way of self-discipline for the rest of my days. Such is life, more freedom always requires more discipline. Fixed rules and regulations from a "Nanny" may make life "safer", but in the end there is a huge question as to if what was lived was a life at all.
Subjection in small affairs manifests itself every day and makes itself felt without distinction by all citizens. It does not make them desperate, but it constantly thwarts them and brings them to renounce the use of their wills. Thus little by little, it extinguishes their spirits and enervates their souls....
Here we live in a country where our founding fathers gave us the immeasurable gift of freedom; yet many would seek to nibble at those freedoms in everything from fireworks bans, trans-fat bans, smoking bans, regulation of political speech through campaign finance laws, higher taxes, and even "fairness doctrines" to decide who can present what speech--because apparently "the Nanny" feels that we are incapable of the independence of America.
Likewise, an infinite God died on the cross to free us from sin AND the Law! Many would choose however to create "a new law" to enslave Christians even more deeply in some set of human created morality. The Devil is indeed in the details, and he is more than willing to help us ensnare ourselves in any number of "good rules".
So does that make me a Libertarian for whom there are no rules? Of course not. Christianity and America both recognize that the road has two ditches. "In the world NOT of it". Freedom applies HUGE responsibility on the individual. To be both considerate and tolerant--2nd hand smoke providing a great example. MUST the STATE tell us how it must be done? Have a free people really lost the ability to interact civilly at the level where the mix of "toleration and consideration" can work successfully? Apparently so.
For Americans and especially Christian Americans, the 4th is a good time to reflect on the issue of Freedom. It absolutely is never free--often that means that blood is required to maintain it, but more subtlety, it means that vigilance at every level is needed. We need to stay out of BOTH ditches--fireworks laws that don't allow sparklers, or "anything goes" with the general public firing up 16" mortars? Seems like moderation is required. The road is often slippery and narrow and the ditches on both sides are far to easy to skid into.
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Maps, Morals and Knowing
Reverence short-circuits objectivity by representing the world under the aspect of an ideal. I am not disparaging reverence—far from it—but I balk at those who recommend “expertise” and “objectivity” for the values they don’t mind dispensing with and “reverence” for their own household deities.
The problem with computers—here is where Mr. Gorman and I may agree—is not the worlds they give us instant access to but the world they encourage us to neglect.
|
Friday, June 22, 2007
Discipline for Kids and Liberals
You can't be in the room when I'm working unless you work, too You get what you get, and you don't throw a fit My friend Joyce, director of our town's preschool, told us about this terrific rule, now repeated by everyone I know on playgrounds and at home. Not only does it have a boppy rhythm that makes it fun to say, but it does good old "Life isn't fair" one better by spelling out both the essential truth of life's arbitrary inequities and the only acceptable response to the world's unfairness: You don't throw a fit. I can't understand you when you speak like that
|
The rules and implementation of them in this list are good ways to deal with children, but since each child presents us with a raw version of human nature to be molded, there are lessons that we as adults need to remember since our natures still want to come out and pout from time to time. "You get what you get and you don't throw a fit" is worthy of Ben Franklin.
Liberalism is largely the elevation of childishness (human nature) to a virtue. "Somebody got more than me so I'm going to call them stupid and try to take their stuff" is pretty much the summary of liberal philosophy. Understanding why they got more, deciding if "stuff" is really good, and taking productive action in pursuit of rationally derived value is a conservative analog.
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Unbiased Press
What a surprise, the MSM gives to Democrats 9 to 1. Of course, THAT would never mean they were biased!
|
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Greatness
I enjoyed the book "Greatness: Reagan, Churchill & the Making of Extraordinary Leaders" by Steven F. Hayward. Some of the quotes I've heard before, but it is great to see them again:
Churchill on history: "The longer you look back, the farther you can look forward".
George Will on Reagan: "He does not want to return to the past; he wants to return to the past's way of facing the future".
Churchill on preemptive war: "There is no merit in putting off a war for a year if when it comes it is a far worse war or one much harder to win".
Churchill on liberal/conservatie: "He who is not a liberal at 20 has to heart; he who is not a conservative at 40 has no brains."
Reagan on liberals: "Sadly, I have come to realize that a great many so-called liberals aren't liberal--they will defend to the death your right to agree with them."
"Reagan was an American conservative. This kind of conservatism is not so much a fusion of the best of the various sects as it is a dialectic, embracing the contradiction of belief in optimism and progress along with the suspicion of human nature that requires limited government. Above all it resists schematic description." (How similar that quote sounds to the Stockdale Paradox)
Reagan in a 1977 speech: "...If there is any political viewpoint in this world that is free of slavish adherence to abstraction, it is American conservatism."
The very well documented book is a study in the similarities and differences between Reagan and Churchill, and the fact that one rhetorically began the cold war (Iron Curtain speech), and one ended it ("Ash heap of history"). The Reagan quote on "your right to agree with them" is very much the core of liberal ideology. From the "fairness doctrine" to "campaign finance reform" to "hate speech", the "liberals" are constantly trying top find ways to prevent speech that they dislike. They are experts at hiding what they really are.
Unfortunately, with the limited level of power gained by the Republican party, the "purity factor" has gone well up, which has weakened the party. Reagan was NOT doctrinaire, but modern conservatives have tried to re-write history to move him farther to the right.
Solid little book ... not a must read, but a nice read.
Churchill on history: "The longer you look back, the farther you can look forward".
George Will on Reagan: "He does not want to return to the past; he wants to return to the past's way of facing the future".
Churchill on preemptive war: "There is no merit in putting off a war for a year if when it comes it is a far worse war or one much harder to win".
Churchill on liberal/conservatie: "He who is not a liberal at 20 has to heart; he who is not a conservative at 40 has no brains."
Reagan on liberals: "Sadly, I have come to realize that a great many so-called liberals aren't liberal--they will defend to the death your right to agree with them."
"Reagan was an American conservative. This kind of conservatism is not so much a fusion of the best of the various sects as it is a dialectic, embracing the contradiction of belief in optimism and progress along with the suspicion of human nature that requires limited government. Above all it resists schematic description." (How similar that quote sounds to the Stockdale Paradox)
Reagan in a 1977 speech: "...If there is any political viewpoint in this world that is free of slavish adherence to abstraction, it is American conservatism."
The very well documented book is a study in the similarities and differences between Reagan and Churchill, and the fact that one rhetorically began the cold war (Iron Curtain speech), and one ended it ("Ash heap of history"). The Reagan quote on "your right to agree with them" is very much the core of liberal ideology. From the "fairness doctrine" to "campaign finance reform" to "hate speech", the "liberals" are constantly trying top find ways to prevent speech that they dislike. They are experts at hiding what they really are.
Unfortunately, with the limited level of power gained by the Republican party, the "purity factor" has gone well up, which has weakened the party. Reagan was NOT doctrinaire, but modern conservatives have tried to re-write history to move him farther to the right.
Solid little book ... not a must read, but a nice read.
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Fornicator in Chief's Speaking Fees
CNN.com - Bill Clinton's talk isn't cheap - Jun 14, 2006
The CNN link is one of many that rather gushingly describes the millions that old Slick rakes in for speaking fees in front of all sorts of groups, business and foreign audiences. They don't mention if any women with kneepads are part of the perks. Free with the Willy Willie really can do no wrong, and there is zero problem with any amount of money that he he is paid from the MSM POV. Reagan getting some fee from some Japanese group for a speech was of course a horrid thing that had the press all up in arms with the "impropriety of it". Newt Gingrich was castigated for "cashing in" on anything that he did in the fee department. As we know, those guys have "Rs" after their name. Liberals will support your right to agree with them with their dying breath--but if your form or freedom doesn't line up with theirs, then you shouldn't make any money or even have a forum. A corporate CEO is of course "taking money away from the little people"--but the money for Hillbilly Bill is printed out from thin air. No problems with THAT cash! Clean as a whistle and very well deserved from the view of any old lefty that would scream bloody murder were it going to a businessman. "Being rank has it's privileges"?
I personally don't mind Billy making money--I don't even mind Brittany making money. I happen to be happily married and even if I wasn't, I hope I wouldn't stoop to his work habits. However, it is easy to understand why a lot of guys are willing to pay him for tips on how to get regular sex at the office and not even have to make regular divorce payments or even lose your job as a result. I like a coffee break at work on a regular basis--I guess I just don't now how to think of potential "work benefits" in a Clintonian way. I'm not sure that his performance can be duplicated by most guys though--they don't have the power to help insure that millions of babies keep giving up their little lives so that the millions of folks can keep the all the physical pleasures of sex without "inconvenient consequences". From the perspective of the unborn, the payment for the Presidential right to stain blue dresses is high.
Ah yes, the gay 90's-- competent Attorney Generals were burning religious nuts in their compounds, and the FBI was busy protecting citizen's rights by shooting tax resistors wives at Ruby Ridge. Life was so much simple, when federal agencies could just incinerate and shoot actual US citizens with next to nothing in the way of outcry. Today we have all the complexities of "enemy combatants" that have a lot more rights than some religious wing-nut US citizens or anti-tax zealots. One has to work hard to protect "diverse terrorists", but when it comes to "the wrong elements" that are US citizens, a little preemptive killing by a President can be a really OK thing--assuming he has time to pull up his pants and give some orders.
The consistency of the left is a shining example to us all.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Door County Trip
A week at work that was less full for me but more full for my wife completed on Thursday when she passed an exam to become a Certified Project Manager--my life should be very well planned from now on! Friday was our anniversary, so we decided to "double celebrate" and headed over to Door County WI. Amazingly, even though I had grown up in WI and we have lived relatively close for all our 22 married years, this is our first trip. It is certainly much closer than it once was now though with a 4-lane Hwy 29 all the way across WI save for like a mile in Wausau.
Some pictures of the outing.
We stayed at the Bay Breeze in Ephraim and it isa very nice place, although not completely what the Internet indicated. We can just see the lake a bit from the deck, not an "on the lake view". We have had a couple wonderful meals at The Old Post Office restaurant at the Edgewater Resort which looks like where we will likely stay when we come back (and we will). We haven't done price comparisons though. We are in a suite here with a very nice king bad (important feature for Mooses) wireless internet access that I have used very little, nice pool that we haven't used at all, and really very comfortable. Over time, one gets spoiled by the "perfect places" like BlueFin Bay on the North Shore and Windcliff outside of Estes in Colorado. Nothing about Bay Breeze to cause a problem , sometimes it --sometimes it takes a couple of trys for "perfection".
Friday night we had a delicious meal at the C&C in Fish Creek, just down the peninsula from Ephraim. Saturday we drove up to the Washington Island Ferry and rode across and biked around that island. We were slightly surprised that there weren't more lake views off the roads over there, and there wasn't a huge amount special about the island, but little ferry rides of that sort are always a bit of their own adventure.
In the PM we headed down the Lake Michigan side of the peninsula with a nice coffee stop at "Custards Last Stand" (yes, we had to have a little cherry custard as well), and then hiked around Cave Point park for a bit. Lots of undermining of the shore, so as the waves come in they make a nice slapping sound. It has been pretty calm however, so not a lot of noise. We then headed over to the Simon Creek Winery for some tasting and picked up a couple bottles of their wares.
The evening meal was a traditional Wisconsin Fish Boil at the Old Post Office. Red potatoes, onions, carrots, and whitefish boiled over a wood fire, and then "boiled over" with a shot of kerosene at the end to push any impurities that may have risen to the top inot the fire and also make a great large fiery show. The results were very tasty with some pumpernickel bread, great cole slaw and some cherry pie with homemade ice cream for desert.
This weekend is the "Fyr Bal" festival in Ephraim (pronounced "Fear Ball"), a Scandinavian festival where the wicked witch of winter is chased away and summer is welcomed. This is accomplished with the lighting of some huge bonfires, about 10 of them around the bay in this case, and shooting off some nice fireworks. It seemed like a really nice festival, made a little quieter by the fact that Ephraim is a dry town, so no beer tents involved with the celebration.
Today we headed up to Gils Rock and went out on Captain Paul's Charter Fishing. He seemed to know what he was doing, but the weather was likely TOO nice ... we put on some miles and tried 4 different spots. A couple of smaller salmon were picked up by other people on the boat, but we weren't on the lucky list this time. We did however get some GREAT smoked Atlantic salmon at the fish store near the boat.
The PM was spent with some shopping, dinner at the Shipwreck Brewery, and then a relaxing evening of reading and catching up on the Blog before heading home tomorrow.
GREAT Medium Cherry Salsa from here
Excellent Smoked N Atlantic Salmon here
Some pictures of the outing.
We stayed at the Bay Breeze in Ephraim and it isa very nice place, although not completely what the Internet indicated. We can just see the lake a bit from the deck, not an "on the lake view". We have had a couple wonderful meals at The Old Post Office restaurant at the Edgewater Resort which looks like where we will likely stay when we come back (and we will). We haven't done price comparisons though. We are in a suite here with a very nice king bad (important feature for Mooses) wireless internet access that I have used very little, nice pool that we haven't used at all, and really very comfortable. Over time, one gets spoiled by the "perfect places" like BlueFin Bay on the North Shore and Windcliff outside of Estes in Colorado. Nothing about Bay Breeze to cause a problem , sometimes it --sometimes it takes a couple of trys for "perfection".
Friday night we had a delicious meal at the C&C in Fish Creek, just down the peninsula from Ephraim. Saturday we drove up to the Washington Island Ferry and rode across and biked around that island. We were slightly surprised that there weren't more lake views off the roads over there, and there wasn't a huge amount special about the island, but little ferry rides of that sort are always a bit of their own adventure.
In the PM we headed down the Lake Michigan side of the peninsula with a nice coffee stop at "Custards Last Stand" (yes, we had to have a little cherry custard as well), and then hiked around Cave Point park for a bit. Lots of undermining of the shore, so as the waves come in they make a nice slapping sound. It has been pretty calm however, so not a lot of noise. We then headed over to the Simon Creek Winery for some tasting and picked up a couple bottles of their wares.
The evening meal was a traditional Wisconsin Fish Boil at the Old Post Office. Red potatoes, onions, carrots, and whitefish boiled over a wood fire, and then "boiled over" with a shot of kerosene at the end to push any impurities that may have risen to the top inot the fire and also make a great large fiery show. The results were very tasty with some pumpernickel bread, great cole slaw and some cherry pie with homemade ice cream for desert.
This weekend is the "Fyr Bal" festival in Ephraim (pronounced "Fear Ball"), a Scandinavian festival where the wicked witch of winter is chased away and summer is welcomed. This is accomplished with the lighting of some huge bonfires, about 10 of them around the bay in this case, and shooting off some nice fireworks. It seemed like a really nice festival, made a little quieter by the fact that Ephraim is a dry town, so no beer tents involved with the celebration.
Today we headed up to Gils Rock and went out on Captain Paul's Charter Fishing. He seemed to know what he was doing, but the weather was likely TOO nice ... we put on some miles and tried 4 different spots. A couple of smaller salmon were picked up by other people on the boat, but we weren't on the lucky list this time. We did however get some GREAT smoked Atlantic salmon at the fish store near the boat.
The PM was spent with some shopping, dinner at the Shipwreck Brewery, and then a relaxing evening of reading and catching up on the Blog before heading home tomorrow.
GREAT Medium Cherry Salsa from here
Excellent Smoked N Atlantic Salmon here
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
Boating on Shore
Alcohol involved? Now let's see, Teddy Kennedy fled the scene with a dead girl in his car and didn't show up until the next AM, and he is VERY rich and VERY well known. I wonder if the community will be disposed to be as forgiving of this guy?
|
The Old Al Gore
Powerline has a link to Gore in '92 on CSPAN Here. One doesn't really need comedians when there are Democrats around.
Did Republicans think differently of Saddam when he was attacking Iran? Sure. I think Americans liked the USSR a bit more when they were fighting with Germany as well. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" isn't very new.
But Gore didn't think Bush Sr was tough enough on Saddam AFTER the Gulf War! Saddam supported terrorists, attacks on US citizens and warships. Saddam had a nuclear program, Saddam used and intended to use again WMDs--Gore sounds like quite a hawk. He still sounded like a Hawk when he was VP and he strongly supported bombing Saddam for all the same problems.
It isn't so much that minds can change. Information, political expediency, age, learning and a whole set of other things can change minds. The wild thing is that if there is a "D" after your name, the MSM never points out the sins of your past (even the videotaped ones), and you are NEVER asked to give an account of "what changed your mind".
Did Republicans think differently of Saddam when he was attacking Iran? Sure. I think Americans liked the USSR a bit more when they were fighting with Germany as well. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" isn't very new.
But Gore didn't think Bush Sr was tough enough on Saddam AFTER the Gulf War! Saddam supported terrorists, attacks on US citizens and warships. Saddam had a nuclear program, Saddam used and intended to use again WMDs--Gore sounds like quite a hawk. He still sounded like a Hawk when he was VP and he strongly supported bombing Saddam for all the same problems.
It isn't so much that minds can change. Information, political expediency, age, learning and a whole set of other things can change minds. The wild thing is that if there is a "D" after your name, the MSM never points out the sins of your past (even the videotaped ones), and you are NEVER asked to give an account of "what changed your mind".
Sunday, June 10, 2007
George Will on the Stealth Economy
The stock market has been breaking records, unemployment is at 4.5%, we have had steady economic growth for 65 months, uh .. "the economy is bad". Or at least that is what folks that are polled believe--it is a "fact" that contributes to the low Bush poll numbers.
George Will does a good job of covering the facts, the Democrats response, and discusses the strange idea of "equal outcome" in a world where God has certainly chosen to not distribute ability or motivation equally. What he doesn't discuss is the right turn of the French. Apparently, even the French have realized that economic growth has some reality-based components. Will the Democrats ever come to that realization?
George Will does a good job of covering the facts, the Democrats response, and discusses the strange idea of "equal outcome" in a world where God has certainly chosen to not distribute ability or motivation equally. What he doesn't discuss is the right turn of the French. Apparently, even the French have realized that economic growth has some reality-based components. Will the Democrats ever come to that realization?
|
Ed Koch On NYT Bush Derangement Syndrome
Ed Koch is a former DEMOCRAT Mayor of NY, but apparently he has been able to avoid the loss of sanity experienced by most Democrats as their Bush hatred and rage causes loss of sanity. The whole column is well worth the read. On the subjects of Gitmo, Libby and selection of important news, it is obvious to all but the enraged that the NYT has slipped the surly bonds of reality and fallen into the abyss of bias.
By
Pray tell, what is wrong with Congress and the President making that distinction when it comes to trials? Further, hasn't the military commission proved its fairness by the very fact that it dismissed the cases of the first two defendants brought before it, finding they were not "unlawful enemy combatants." Instead of assaulting the military tribunal as it did, shouldn't The Times have praised its fairness? Of course, but The Times is so blinded by its fury on the Iraq war and its hatred of President Bush that its editorial board can't think straight on these issues.
|
Saturday, June 09, 2007
Ah, The Weekend! LDoS
I've often noticed that the joy of time off seems proportional in some sense to the difficulty of the work that preceeded it. The last day of schooling with finals over, a difficult task at work completed successfully, or some speech, paper, or distasteful home task well done and now comes "Miller Time". Marketing people are actually quite good at distilling some of our basic natures to their purposes and those old Miller beer commercials catch the feeling pretty well.
So the rough week at work was ncompleted, and the year at school for our 15 year old completed as well. If the "last day of school" (LDoS) could be bottled, it would be a product very easy to market. It seems that is one of those feelings that is "age and condition of life specific" that would be impossible to fully reach again in adulthood, but the weekend has been a hint of that. The level of youth, health, optimism, lack of experience in the ills of life, still feeling generally free of responsibility for themselves and others; linked with the wonderful completion of "that year is completely behind me and next year I begin again with a fresh slate" makes LDoS one of those life experiences to be savored.
Like all human experience, that LDoS is of course significantly illusionary. You certainly CAN die when you are in your teens. You certainly can create all manner of problems that may dog you for the rest of your days--habits, addictions, attitudes, damaging relationships, teenage pregnancy and other guilt / fallout from the victory of hormones over morality, injuries, crimes--the list is endless of course. In the way of nature however, when you are in your teens those downsides are quite far from the mind. You tend to feel invincible, your future is long with potentials unbounded, and the very fact of not really grasping the potential for "life changing ill" makes the experience what it is.
Socrates said "An unexamined life is not worth living". Interestingly, the result of that examination is often significantly that one becomes "consciously incompetent". You begin to know what you don't know. The more one learns, the more one realizes that the process of learning is always begining with "unconscious incompetence" (not being aware of what you don't know); to "conscious incompetence"; followed by "unconscious competence" where for some task or piece of life you "do the right thing", but may no longer be aware of how it was learned or why you do it.
Rosseau, and I suspect many liberals would arge that the LDoS feeling becomes inaccessable with examination, and the person is no longer "authentic". What Socrates and a conservative would see as "not worth living", the Rosseau and the liberal see as "not really life". The categorization, the judgment, the realization of inadequacy, the realizations of impermanence--all conspire in their minds to destroy "the human experience".
Knowledge and experience certainly change us, but while it is impossible to capture the "same exact experience" of the LDoS we experienced in youth, it has seemed this weekend that there are aspects that are even better. Having completed over 50 years of "life schooling" with at some level of decent grades in matters of earthy importance, weekends like this and the prospects for some other experiences of "Miller Time" in the coming weeks of summer has made this weekend so very enjoyable.
The examined life is VERY much worth living!
So the rough week at work was ncompleted, and the year at school for our 15 year old completed as well. If the "last day of school" (LDoS) could be bottled, it would be a product very easy to market. It seems that is one of those feelings that is "age and condition of life specific" that would be impossible to fully reach again in adulthood, but the weekend has been a hint of that. The level of youth, health, optimism, lack of experience in the ills of life, still feeling generally free of responsibility for themselves and others; linked with the wonderful completion of "that year is completely behind me and next year I begin again with a fresh slate" makes LDoS one of those life experiences to be savored.
Like all human experience, that LDoS is of course significantly illusionary. You certainly CAN die when you are in your teens. You certainly can create all manner of problems that may dog you for the rest of your days--habits, addictions, attitudes, damaging relationships, teenage pregnancy and other guilt / fallout from the victory of hormones over morality, injuries, crimes--the list is endless of course. In the way of nature however, when you are in your teens those downsides are quite far from the mind. You tend to feel invincible, your future is long with potentials unbounded, and the very fact of not really grasping the potential for "life changing ill" makes the experience what it is.
Socrates said "An unexamined life is not worth living". Interestingly, the result of that examination is often significantly that one becomes "consciously incompetent". You begin to know what you don't know. The more one learns, the more one realizes that the process of learning is always begining with "unconscious incompetence" (not being aware of what you don't know); to "conscious incompetence"; followed by "unconscious competence" where for some task or piece of life you "do the right thing", but may no longer be aware of how it was learned or why you do it.
Rosseau, and I suspect many liberals would arge that the LDoS feeling becomes inaccessable with examination, and the person is no longer "authentic". What Socrates and a conservative would see as "not worth living", the Rosseau and the liberal see as "not really life". The categorization, the judgment, the realization of inadequacy, the realizations of impermanence--all conspire in their minds to destroy "the human experience".
Knowledge and experience certainly change us, but while it is impossible to capture the "same exact experience" of the LDoS we experienced in youth, it has seemed this weekend that there are aspects that are even better. Having completed over 50 years of "life schooling" with at some level of decent grades in matters of earthy importance, weekends like this and the prospects for some other experiences of "Miller Time" in the coming weeks of summer has made this weekend so very enjoyable.
The examined life is VERY much worth living!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)