Monday, September 15, 2008

BO in the Kerry, Gore, Dukakis, Mondale, McGovern, Humphrey Role

ReviewJournal.com - Opinion - JOHN BRUMMETT: He's Kerry; she's Reagan

Good little sour grapes lefty view of what has happened to "The One". BO certainly wasn't going the Slick Willie route, so either he was going to be coronated without a fight (the MSM plan), make a "completely new way", or be sort of a "Jimmy Carter stealth far lefty win because folks don't like Bush" (I believe the BO plan to the extent he does planning), or he was going to lose like all the other admited lefty candidates have for a long time.

Carter was an aberration -- he barely beat Ford anyway, who was not much of a campaigner. People were mad as hell, and the "outsider" looked good to them. BUT, at least SOME folks may have learned their lesson there.

Slick was really slick, but without Perot and the breaking of the "read my lips" pledge, he would have went down in flames.

Rollin's on Palin Game Change

Commentary: How Palin changed the game - CNN.com

Ed Rollins does a good job here and puts the right analogy out. "Now McCain as a 2 yard lead with 98 yards to go to score". HOPEFULLY McCain is smart enough to not get complacent like BO.

Good, relatively short read, especially liked this section:

Then his world stopped with Sen. John McCain's shocking selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin
for the vice presidential nomination. And over the last two weeks, the
governor of Alaska has deflected the arc of Obama's campaign. She can
match his pretty words. The outdoor game has changed from "horse" to
"moose," and only one candidate in this race has shot "moose."


Obama's campaign diminished itself by challenging her experience. The
candidate who ranked 99th in Senate seniority, with one of the thinnest
resumes ever when he began his presidential quest, looked foolish
challenging a governor who made decisions every day while he was
missing votes in the Senate running for president.


BO Tried to Stall Withdrawl?

OBAMA TRIED TO STALL GIS' IRAQ WITHDRAWAL - New York Post

I'm not going to put a big bet on the veracity of this, but it does sound like something that BO might at least WANT to do. The following sounds like a pretty good analysis of BO from "foreigners":

Iraqi leaders are divided over the US election. Iraqi President
Jalal Talabani (whose party is a member of the Socialist International)
sees Obama as "a man of the Left" - who, once elected, might change his
opposition to Iraq's liberation. Indeed, say Talabani's advisers, a
President Obama might be tempted to appropriate the victory that
America has already won in Iraq by claiming that his intervention transformed failure into success.

Maliki's advisers have persuaded him that Obama will win - but the
prime minister worries about the senator's "political debt to the
anti-war lobby" - which is determined to transform Iraq into a disaster
to prove that toppling Saddam Hussein was "the biggest strategic
blunder in US history."


One has to go outside of the US to get really accurate analysis of how our left wing thinks! I really like the understanding that a good thing for a "man of the left" to do is to pick up someone else's success and declare it his! Great bunch of folks!



Sunday, September 14, 2008

Barone Ought Not Have Written This

McCain Flies His Campaign Past Obama by Michael Barone on National Review Online

Barone is a genius, and they often are too willing to share their knowledge. I suspect that BO has never read much in the way of military fighter strategy, but I've read a little, and of course McCain has EXPERIENCED a lot! Is it "fair" to try to get inside your oponents head? I'm sure that Putin, Bin Ladin and a ton of other folks out there spend all day long worrying about that issue! You want to play in the big leagues, you better be able to handle the big leagues. HOPEFULLY that is what a real Presidential campaign will show.

So far, all BO and the MSM are doing since McCain launched the Palin offensive is cry "foul", "sleaze", call names, and try to pick on old war wounds. The #1 on one ticket going after the #2 on the other ticket isn't really good strategy in any case, and the unspoken dynamic is that it is likely even LESS good when the #1 is a man and the #2 is a woman.

BO and the MSM are in high dudgeon, that is for sure. They had this all figured out (and I sure thought they did as well), and now it appears to be unraveling pretty fast. Let us hope it accelerates!!

Little Interview Comparison

Power Line: Sarah Palin unexpurgated

I suppose that anyone that still thinks the MSM is unbiased probably thinks that Sarah Palin is the devil and BO is god, so the difference in questioning is just fine. But for those that are still in this world, it is easy to see the bias.

Biden Admits Hillary Better VP Pick



There you have it, His Supreme Worshipfulness BO picked the wrong VP!

Saturday, September 13, 2008

BO Jumps the Shark

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Obama's Altitude Sickness

For anyone that wonders what happened to BO, I think Charles has it pretty much covered. It is WELL worth reading the whole deal, but like all retrospectives, it is simple in hindsight.

BO based his candidacy on smooth speaking, "hope", and the idea that he could run against Bush. He selected Slow Joe Biden as a "run out the clock" running mate. He felt he was ahead by two touchdowns at least, running out the clock was prudent.

What he didn't realize is that novelty is a VERY important part of celebrity. When you choose to base your appeal on celebrity, you better not let the novelty wear off, or worse yet, get eclipsed. His Sermon to the Germans was certainly over the top-it was "presidential", but BO was just plain old celebrity BO, NOT the President. People tend to not like posers. Last January, we all knew that the Pats would win the Super Bowl. Sure, America likes an underdog, but we KNEW the answer. Oh, wait, the game still had to be played and wonder of wonders, the Giants won and the Pats lost. BO forgot that the presidential election game has to be played through--until the fat lady sings.

So McCain threw the Palin hail mary, and if trends continue, the end will have been "obvious". Of course, I'm far from certain that will happen-it is more like half-time in the Superbowl and the underdogs are ahead. There are A LOT of things that almost certainly WILL go wrong, and they may well be fatal to McCain / Palin.

One thing is clear, BO can make strategic mistakes, and a lot of them. BUT, is he going to be able to equal George Bush and recover his election as Bush recovered the Iraq war with the surge? That is the kind of thing that leadership is about, so maybe it is a good test. BO has never faced a challenge even close to this large, but McCain has. Right now it appears that the only answer BO has is to pull out the negative stops in ways beyond any political hack job I've ever seen. Make fun of the fact that a war hero can't use a computer because of injuries solved in the service of our country? Seems "out there", but that is where BO is at now. Does that help him win? Wow, I hope not, it OUGHT to BURY him, but with the MSM on his side it is always hard to predict. It certainly seems to to lower than "Willie Horton" or "Swift Boating"--we need a cool one-liner. "BO POW Attack"? "POW O-Bashing"?

Friday, September 12, 2008

BO Not Being Bullied, But Being an Idiot

Power Line: Obama Gets Tough, Shoots Self In Head

Gee, McCain "can't send and e-mail or use a computer". Wonder if BO ever thought to check "why"? Ever notice how John holds his arms kinda funny? Gee, I wonder why that is? Oops, it is because they have been broken so badly he can't hold his hands right to type. THAT is why he "can't send an e-mail or use a computer". Gee BO, you "community organizers" are really tough guys!!

BO is claiming that "he won't be bullied"! Where I come from, that kinda depends on who the bully is and how they are doing the bullying. If they have a gun to the head of your wife or kids, you might feel quite "bullied", no matter how tough you actually are. If you actually ARE tough at all, you likely know that there is ALWAYS someone tougher. In BOs case, I'd say Sarah Barracuda could take him out in just about any way she picked (hand to hand, guns, knives, wits, tiddly winks, etc). Of course I'd say she could probably take out close to 50% of the male population as well, so BO isn't really THAT bad off.

Headline News: Biden's Sister Supports HIm!!

Biden a born leader, sister says - CNN.com

Wow we get the important news that his sister supports him and the answer to the age-old question of if leaders are "born or made" all in one headline. Who says the MSM isn't valuable?

I wonder if they have found any other supporters for him? People are sort of forgetting who the VP candidate on the Dem side is, so it is good to show that he has a supporter!

MSM Mad as Hell

Power Line: The Press: Mad As Hell, and Not Going to Take It Any More

It all needs to be read, but Mark Steyn really "get it" in a couple paragraphs I stole, "Howie" refers to Howard Kurtz, the author of the original column on how mad the press is getting that McCain has "manipulated them":

Howie feels the press is being "manipulated" by the McCain campaign.

Maybe it is. A conventional launch strategy for a little-known vice-presidential nominee might have involved "manipulating" the media into running umpteen front-pagers on Sarah Palin's amazing primary challenge of a sitting governor and getting the sob-sisters to slough off a ton of heartwarming stories about her son shipping out to Iraq.

But, if you were really savvy, you'd "manipulate" the media into a stampede of lurid drivel deriding her as a Stepford wife and a dominatrix, comparing her to Islamic fundamentalists, Pontius Pilate and porn stars, and dismissing her as a dysfunctional brood mare who can't possibly be the biological mother of the kid she was too dumb to abort. Who knows? It's a long shot, but if you could pull it off, a really cunning media manipulator might succeed in manipulating Howie's buddies into spending the month after Labor Day outbidding each other in some insane Who Wants To Be An Effete Condescending Media Snob? death-match. You'd not only make the press look like bozos, but that in turn might tarnish just a little the fellow these geniuses have chosen to anoint.


I sincerely doubt that that McCain had any idea that the MSM would implode with buckets of hate speech, but if he did, he is the biggest surprise of political brilliance ever.

Temple of BO

So BO will give his speech from a fake greek temple. I'm not sure why, but the Nazis liked the "greek look" as well.



Power Line: The Temple of Obama

Now THIS Is Newsworthy!

CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Former GOP senator calls Palin a ‘cocky wacko’ « - Blogs from CNN.com

Lincoln Chafee was the total RINO for years (Republican in Name Only) serving with no distinction at all other than he was to the left of most Democrats. The MSM has often loved him since he OFTEN said bad things about Republicans (for some odd reason, the "unbiased MSM" seems to love that) He lost his Senate seat, and now calls himself an "Independent" and CNN thinks that his comments on Sarah Palin are worth a headline.

Joe Lieberman on the other hand was the Democrats VP Candidate in 2000, had to run as an Independent because Democrats have no more room for such a thing as a "moderate Democrat". In '06, if you couldn't completely agree with them that Iraq was a lost cause and immediate surrender was the only option, then you were OUT!!! So Joe was out and STILL won his seat and is STILL in the Senate. In fact, he gave a very good speech at the Republican convention supporting McCain / Palin. Now the only headline that got on CNN was about how the Democrats were thinking of "disciplyning" him in the Senate! (They are always so interested in "free speech" as long as it is in 100% agreement with them).

So Lincoln the ex-RINO thinks that Sarah is a "cocky wacko". That is the kind of news that is worthy of putting in the headlines only for an MSM that is so far in the left ditch they can't even see the road.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Hatred Gets Bitchy

Op-Ed Columnist - My Fair Veep - Op-Ed - NYTimes.com

I'm positive that any female that wanted to run for President with a "D" would be "super ready" to old Maureen. Hillary has declared that being FIRST LADY makes one qualified- I wonder if she would have brain surgery from the WIFE of the brain surgeon that had a nice degree in art criticism? Why not? If she thought Hillary was "qualified", one would think it would be a NO BRAINER!!!!

BO has been a "community organizer" and held a couple legislative jobs, including about 2 years as Senator before he started officially running for Prez. He hasn't held any decision making executive jobs AT ALL! (Just like Hillary by the way).

Sarah has had TWO executive jobs ... somehow her two years as Governor are "way too short", while BOs scant two years in the Senate (which isn't an executive job anyway) are HUGE. Gee, I wonder why that is? Historically we have ALWAYS looked to Governors, Mayors and military guys for the Presidency.

Why? Anyone that as actually ever led anything realizes that leadership is the task of making DECISIONS between alternatives that are ALWAYS flawed. We live in a flawed world--even if you ever do pick the "perfect thing", your enemies will hate it and find some way to call it bad. Leadership is a lot about realizing that and finding ways to make progress in this imperfect world.

For anyone that has led anything it is obvious that Palin is way more qualified than BO. McCain is more qualified than her only on the basis of time and his military service from long ago. Biden isn't qualified to park my car, but it seems that everyone has forgotten about him entirely, and right now it is a Palin / BO race. I'm thinking it isn't that good a sign when your #1 looks bad next to the #2 of the other party, but one wants to be sympathetic to Democrats. They could have nominated Hillary in the #1 slot and BO in the #2 and won by a bigger landslide than Reagan, but I guess they wanted it to be interesting.

BO As Community Organizer

What Did Obama Do As A Community Organizer? by Byron York on National Review Online

This is a little on the long side, but has some good information to understand BO's strengths and weaknesses. The summary:

- "The Hope is the product". BO tends to make the easily led believe him, but he doesn't have a lot of history of DOING much of anything but getting himself to the next level of power.

- He claims to be about "bringing together", he is really a far left partisan. Here he is in his own book on Ronald Reagan, a guy who won 48 out of 50 states in '84--how is THAT for "together"!
Obama wrote in his memoir, Dreams from My Father.
“Instead, I’d pronounce on the need for change. Change in the White House, where Reagan and his minions were carrying on their dirty deeds. Change in the Congress, compliant and corrupt. Change in the mood of the country, manic and self-absorbed. Change won’t come from the top, I would say. Change will come from a mobilized grass roots.”


Ah yes, Reagan and his MINIONS were carrying on their DIRTY deeds! ... and every state but Taxachusets and Leftysota voting for him!

- He is a SUPER organizer, but he has a hard time figuring out what ought be done with the organization. He is sort of an "organizer savant". He has managed to pull together a very big political machine, but it isn't clear at all WHY other than "Hope and Change".

Uh, BO Finds "Change" Shameless?

CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Obama: These folks are shameless « - Blogs from CNN.com

Gee, I thought BO found just throwing the term "change" around with nothing specific behind it to be the essence of good politics. They haven't even said "hope" yet that I have heard.

Did BO copyright these words? As far as I know, he could round up all the Republicans and put us in a concentration camp and fullfill his promise for "change"-- or even "real change" (that is his detailed version).

Last I checked, the Democrats had been in control of both houses of congress for the past two years -- which is the period that the gas prices shot up, we had a single quarter of down GDP (not a recession) and the housing market fell causing financial problems. When the Democrats were running in '06, they seemed to be claiming that they could get a LOT done. What happened? The one thing they REALLY claimed they would get done -- immediate and unconditional surrender by the US in Iraq, was thwarted when they discovered that the President is Commnader in Chief. Thank God--had BO and the Dems their way, at least 100's of thousands and probably millions would have died, and the US would be WAY less safe than we are today.

"Shameless"? What would that mean? The Democrats ran on "change" in '06, didn't they do what they promised already? I mean the economy is clearly worse and gas prices are higher, maybe they can claim; "hey, at least we had an effect"!

Bittersweet Mythology

Sarah Palin's Myth of America - TIME

Mr Klein actually comes very close to stumbling over the truth here. He sees half of it--successful Republican politicians use the power of story and myth to get their points across. The part he doesn't see is that Democrats do absolutely the same thing, often with even more power due to Hollywood and the MSM compliance of guys like Klein that see their own story as "fact" and the other guys as "myth".

FDR is WAY more mythology than truth. The "New Deal" never worked, it was WWII that bailed us out. FDR did give us gigantic vote buying social pork programs that have killed a lot of the American spirit of individual responsibility and have bills that continually come due in bail-out after bail-out, because the old adage that there is "no free lunch" is unfortunately still true in the universe of reality as opposed to myth.

The idea that the "ideal" must be something that is "reality" for most Americans is very strange. There is no reason at all that Americans can't rally around the values of "small town America" even though they don't live there. "Values" are quite transportable--our forefathers transferred mostly the enlightenment version of European Judeo / Christian values to this continent. They didn't have to start a "new mythology" because they no longer lived in Europe. Indeed, Christianity is largely not of this world at all--yet for over a billion people, they profess that it applies even though in reality they live here and not in heaven.

Politics are ALWAYS heavily tinged with mythology--as are sports, the arts, romance, products, and everything else that humans deal with. We convert an effectively infinite cosmos into a set of "myths" or "stories" that make sense to us at a level that we can grasp as humans. Our ENTIRE reality is and can only be "human" ... coming into a very limited gray matter brain through sense organs that have have very minimal bandwidth and being processed WAY short of "real time". Klein uses the common "man in the street" connection of "Myth = lie" and for the audience that he is trying to reach, I'm sure that has the effect he wants.

He is no doubt aware that for the more educated, "myth" is often a positive description of truths that are more significant than "mere fact" -- Joseph Campbell has done a few books on that subject.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

MSM Changes Tale on Troops for Afghanistan

Admiral: Troops alone will not yield victory in Afghanistan - CNN.com

Gee, the MSM, Kerry, BO story has been "We took the eye off the ball in Afghanistan and fought the WRONG WAR in Iraq, we ought to have had those troops in Afghanistan hunting down Osama Bin Ladin".

But wait! Now Bush is transferring troops from Iraq to Afghanistan because we are winning in Iraq and the Al Quaeda forces are fleeing back to Afghanistan. One of the few things that the MSM and BO have any consistency on is THEY HATE GEORGE BUSH and he is ALWAYS WRONG!

Ergo, it is now a BAD IDEA to shift troops from Iraq to Afghanistan!!! NOTE!! We have a TON of "Admirals / Generals / etc". You can ALWAYS find testimony from more than one of them that agrees with whatever perspective one might have. That is precisely why we need LEADERSHIP in the Oval Office rather than BO.

Even the Liberals are Noticing

Op-Ed Columnist - From the Gut - Op-Ed - NYTimes.com

I'm sure that most of the left will account for McCain's rise and BOs slide in the polls with their usual effective reasoning--Republican lies, corporate money, Karl Rove, racism, etc, Friedman goes against the grain and actually thinks that BO may have some control over his own chances! Wow, now THAT is a refreshing thought for a lefty!

Tom thinks that BO is actually going to have to do more than say "I'm not Bush and McCain is". Cool! Now THAT would actually be a different sort of lefty politics!

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

"Bailouts"

I'm amazed at how out to lunch a lot of lefty's are on the Fannie and Freddie "bailout".

First some history --If you look really close, you will find that the "F" in both of those stands for FEDERAL. They were initiated in 1938 under FDR and for 30 years was ALL Federal. In 1968 (Democrats in charge of all branches of government), they were moved to a rather odd state of affairs where effectively the profits could be privatized, but since their names stayed FEDERAL, many people (and countries) erroneously assumed that purchasing their bundled mortgages was backed by the "full faith and credit of the US Government", just like bank deposits. They hold something like 6 TRILLION in debt, which is more than the GDP of Japan and close to half of the GDP of the US.

The S&L bailout of the early '90s had a similar history. They had been around forever and regulated heavily since the '30s, but Carter decided to remove a lot of restrictions on them, mostly in order to encourage them to shore up the sagging home sales that had been decimated by the high inflation and poor economy of the late '70s (Carter's economy). By the early '90s, that mess cost the US $150 Billion. In comparison, the current estimate for Fanny and Freddy is "only" 25 Billion (done by CBO, Democrat congress, so it MUST be right!).

Why bail them out? Well for starters, it doesn't help the STOCKHOLDERS in Fanny and Freddy at all--they are out a whole lot of money in lost stock price. What it DOES do is preserve the financial markets, without which, both our and the world economies would be headed for something worse than the 70's and maybe in "depression territory". Once the left creates huge bloated FEDERAL entities it is only a matter of time before they have to be "bailed out" with more good money thrown after bad.

Not many folks in business would argue in favor of massive federal organizations being created to do what the private sector can do better in the FIRST PLACE, but it seems that one party always thinks that it is good idea to try it again. Predictably, the task gets beyond the capability of even the massive federal bureaucracy and they decide that "privatization/regulation" is going to be successful. Of course, government being government, what they do best is "blame the other party", so over time they at least fail at the regulation, but often go well beyond that and either "strongly encourage" or "force" the originally federally created entity to provide goods/services/finance to people that are poor credit risks (but vote). It is a semi-privatized version of the old old government story of "buying votes".

Once the federally created entity gets in enough trouble that it can no longer be hidden by just pointing at the other party--S&Ls, FNMA, FICA, etc, then somebody steps up to fix the problem. (oddly, that always seems to be Republicans) ... Bush 1 in early '90s with S&Ls, Bush 2 in '08 with FNMA ... of course Bush 2 made the mistake of trying to do something to fix FICA BEFORE the "crises" happens, but he paid dearly for that attempt! Americans seem to want to ignore reality as long as possible. Last big fix to FICA was Reagan in '92 ... REALLY the "largest tax increase in history" since the upper limits keep growing. Again, note the Republican cleaning up the Democrats mess--and, they of course love to howl when the cleanup of their own mess adds to the deficit!!

It used to be that Democrats handed out programs and Republicans raised taxes to pay for them. The Democrats and MSM liked that relationship. Reagan changed that, while he DID raise quite a few taxes, he decided that ultimately that wasn't a good answer for the country since the high taxes continued to push down the potential for economic growth, thus reducing the standard of living for all. The cutting the taxes ignited the 30 years of best in history US economic growth that we have just gone through.

BUT, folks still seem to believe that one can create a whole bunch of new programs that will somehow "redistribute the pie" without stopping the pie from growing. It has never worked in the past because the folks that make the pie figure that there ought to be some reward to all that work they are doing. Eventually, Democrats pretty much want to turn the country into a giant concentration camp, only what they WANT is the top 1-5% of the folks working like dogs and getting as little as they can possibly give them and the other 95-99% voting Democrat and complaining that the 1-5% aren't working hard enough.

If ONLY the top 1-5% were actually as stupid as the Democrats typically believe they are, that might have some prayer of working.

Uh, BO Finds "Change" Shameless?

CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Obama: These folks are shameless « - Blogs from CNN.com

Gee, I thought BO found just throwing the term "change" around with nothing specific behind it to be the essence of good politics. They haven't even said "hope" yet that I have heard.

Did BO copyright these words? As far as I know, he could round up all the Republicans and put us in a concentration camp and fullfill his promise for "change"-- or even "real change" (that is his detailed version).

Last I checked, the Democrats had been in control of both houses of congress for the past two years -- which is the period that the gas prices shot up, we had a single quarter of down GDP (not a recession) and the housing market fell causing financial problems. When the Democrats were running in '06, they seemed to be claiming that they could get a LOT done. What happened? The one thing they REALLY claimed they would get done -- immediate and unconditional surrender by the US in Iraq, was thwarted when they discovered that the President is Commnader in Chief. Thank God ... had BO and the Dems their way, at least 100's of thousands and probably millions would have died, and the US would be WAY less safe than we are today.

"Shameless"?

MSM Has Change Of Heart on Religion

Pastor: GOP may be downplaying Palin's religious beliefs - CNN.com

BO ran along for nearly a year before the Hillary campaign brought out the views of the church he had attended for 20 years. MSM view? "BO's religion is a private matter, no reason to look" ... at least for BO.

Of course in BOs case, the church was anti-American, anti-semetic, and racist against whites. One MAY think that all those views would be HIGHLY appropriate to be examined.

In Palin's case, it is pretty much standard reasonably fundamentalist Christianity very close to what I grew up with and what probably 20-30 million US citizens believe -- and in fact is not really much out of touch with what something in the 200+ million would at least profess to believe. God is involved in the world, there are important moral issues relative to both this and the next life, God may well pass "judgement" (although for a human to claim they know what is "judgement" is always shakey, but often done).

Why the difference in treatment? Well, certainly most of it is good old MSM bias, where "if a Republican does it, it is probably evil, stupid, fattening, or all of the above" ... so BO's religion is most likely fine in their minds, and Palin's is suspect at best. I think the other part in this case is that BO's church pretty much sounds like the beliefs of the MSM -- anti-American, anti-Jewish and anti-white. No doubt they saw those views and thought "sounds like a reasonable church".

Palin's church sounds pretty foreign to them ... real spirit and authority of God, pro-American, pro-family, pro-life, pro-personal responsibility, etc ... all those beliefs are "out there" relative to the MSM.

Monday, September 08, 2008

WOW, McCain Palin Deadlocked with BO and Slow Joe?

McCain, Obama deadlocked in presidential race - CNN.com

Maybe the MSM doesn't really hold ALL the cards! Sounds like with the addition of Sarah Barracuda and the convention bounce, BO may be in some trouble. Maybe beating up on a pregnant 17 year old girl isn't the kind of thing that most Americans find palatable?

Who knows ... maybe there is hope yet!

Sunday, September 07, 2008

Why Must the Left Destroy Palin?

Why They Hate Her

The whole article is OK, but the summary is in a single paragraph. There are a whole lot of reasons for the left to hate Palin, a woman that is a Republican is almost as galling to them as a black Republican, but the MAIN reason is the one below. Leftism demands destruction of the family, the family provides a conduit for hated moral content to be transmitted to children outside the control of the state. For leftism and collectivism to be triumphant, the family MUST be destroyed. One of the main tenents that they hold sacred to do that is that a "traditional family", with kids from one couple that stays together MUST be "demeaning, constraining, damagine, etc" to the woman. It is IMPOSSIBLE to be an "intelligent, successful, influential, fullfilled, etc" woman AND be in a traditional family. Sarah Palin is an example of something the left elite would say CAN'T EXIST! She must be destroyed!
The simple fact of her being a pro-life married mother of five with a thriving political career was--before anything else about her was known--enough for the left and its outliers to target her for destruction. She could not be allowed to contradict symbolically one of the central narratives of the left. How galling it will be to Sarah Palin's many new enemies if she survives this assault and prevails. If she does, her success may be an important moment in the struggle to shape not just America's politics but its culture.

Friday, September 05, 2008

Saint Trooper Speaks!

Trooper in Palin probe tells his side - CNN.com

Well, obviously this trooper is great and Palin is the devil. I mean this guy has "admitted to mistakes and has learned from them"! Assuming he has a "D" next to his name, that would exonerate him from anything. Now, when he was actually investigated, here is what was found:
In 2006, state investigators found Wooten guilty of "a significant
pattern of judgment failures," including using a Taser on his
10-year-old stepson and drinking beer while operating a state trooper
vehicle. Wooten was suspended for 10 days as "a last chance to take
corrective action."
But, he has a LOT of explanations, and even though he was found guilty of drinking, he says he wasn't. Sarah Palin is a definite "R" that has even been willing to sign up as a VP candidate that could cause BO some challenge. Certainly that choice deserves punishment -- death if possible, but if that can't be pulled off, the Ds and the MSM will go for whatever they can.

Clearly Wooten was framed ... CNN covers his side very well, his 10-year old was HAPPY to be tasered! I think that is why they invented the things-to make kids happy. If only Wooten would get the picture and come out hard after Sarah, we would KNOW that he is completely in the right and truthful. I mean, certainly you can trust a guy that went through a messy divorce from the womans sister, those are NEVER the kind of folks that bear a grudge!

Artists and Republicans

CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Heart condemns McCain-Palin use of ‘Barracuda’ « - Blogs from CNN.com

I happened to watch a bit of Leno last night after the McCain speech. 100% down on Sara Palin, McCain and everything Republican -- to the point that he even lost his studio audience and had to make some lame statement about "tension in the room". There are always folks in the entertainment industry "condeming Republicans" in one way or another, but I always wonder if they really understand what that means.

I'm sure that the message of Heart is basically "We hate Republicans", which other than hate not being the nicest of emotions, is fine. I wonder if the Beatles ever condemned Charlie Manson's use of "Helter Skelter"? Somehow I doubt it.

I listen to NPR every day, and they are CONSTANTLY concerned about "how partisan Republicans are". I'm not really sure what "partisan" means other than "thinking differently in a group", which apparently NPR and Heart are actually against. Sooner or later, "diversity of thought" is going to mean that someone doesn't agree with you, and in fact you find their opinions to be "wrong" in some sense, maybe even a very significant sense. If "freedom" has any meaning, one would think that such "partisanship" would be very much expected. Having multiple competing ideas would seem to be a great way to figure out what works and what doesn't -- unless you are already certain that your ideas DON'T work and have realized that the only way to succeed is to suppress the ideas of the opposition.

The supposed "liberal folks" -- art, media, education, etc are drawn to a set of ideas that probably they even realize don't work. Radical income distribution, destruction of the family, inability to defend the nation militarily, anti-business, etc. When those ideas are put into practice, the only way they can "succeed" is with a dictator (since people won't vote for actual failure for long), who promptly destroys the individual rights that the arts, media and education depend on as well as the economic surplus (funds beyond food, clothing, shelter) that the more "elite" require to exist. It seems they are somehow forced to bite, and if possible even kill the very hand that "feeds" their existence.

Strangely, the modern "conservative" (which are actually the true "liberals") has no trouble liking BOTH Heart and "Sarah Barracuda".

Thursday, September 04, 2008

Nice Cover Contrast

Us Weekly Cover Blasts Sarah Palin, but for the Obamas It’s a Cakewalk - America’s Election HQ

Little difference in magazine cover treatment between BO and SP? Nah, there is no bias in the MSM!

Secret Economic Data

BEA: News Release: Gross Domestic Product and Corporate Profits

As the Democrats and the MSM tell us, we are deep in the SECOND "Bush Recession". The old definition of "recession" was two or more consecutive quarters with negative GDP growth. We don't know the NEW definition yet (Republican President = Recession?), but apparently we can now be in a recession with a GDP growth rate of 3.3%!

I also love their assessment of why we achieved this growth:

The acceleration in real GDP growth in the second quarter primarily reflected a larger decrease in imports, an acceleration in exports, an acceleration in PCE, a smaller decrease in residential fixed investment, and an upturn in state and local government spending that were partly offset by a larger decrease in inventory investment.
<br />Gee, less imports and more exports--that must be "double secret", I'm not even sure that BO would be able to spin that as bad news!<br /><br />Clinton, from '93 - 2000 would have spent 14 quarters in "recession" if the "new definition" has anything at all to do with GDP. <br />


Lieberman a Liar Too

Democrats attack Lieberman, saying he lied to delegates - CNN.com

Democrats are always the truthful ones. Strange how a practicing Jewish guy that was their own VP candidate in 2000 is taking the time to get up there and "lie" in front of the Republican convention and is supporting the Republican candidate. There is no way that such a guy could be principled and standing up for what he believes to be true!

So John McCain, a guy that the press AND the Democrats LOVED when he was disagreeing with how Bush was carrying out the war in Iraq, against the Bush tax cuts, part of the "gang of whatever" that prevented Republicans from using the "nuclear option" in the Senate to get Bush appointments through is now "just like Bush"!

Could it be possible that Lieberman and McCain are still where they always were -- standing up for principles that they believe in, while the Democrats and the media have slid farther and farther to the left? If someone sees BO as not doing an effective job of "reaching across the aisle", that makes them a LIAR?

McCain has a long history of being bipartisan. I tend to disagree with a Republican being bipartisan because of exactly what we see here. As long as that bipartisanship is damaging to the Republican cause, the MSM treats the bipartisan Republican as a HERO, but as soon as those bipartisan actions could aid them in a contest with DEMOCRATS, that history is completely lost and they are "another Bush" (or whomever the Republican MSM demon of the day is).

Iraq? Where is Iraq?

Iraq's caldron cools down - Opinion - USATODAY.com

As readers of the MSM know, we lost the war in Iraq, the surge was a failure, and the early recognition of these "facts" is the chief reason that we have the brilliant Dems, BO and Joe the Plagarist running for President.

Oh, but wait, page 100 ... it appears that we DIDN'T lose the war and things continue to look up and up. They turned ANBAR over to Iraqi control!! One would think this is a national secret on the same level as the economy growing at 3.3% in the 2nd quarter during the "recession".

The MSM has decided that if reality favors Republican policies, the answer is SIMPLE -- down with reality, up with fantasy!!

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Temple of BO

So BO will give his speech from a fake greek temple. I'm not sure why, but the Nazis liked the "greek look" as well.



Power Line: The Temple of Obama

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

The Poor Economy

Another sign of that "horrible Bush economy". Be nice to have BO and a bunch of Dems in the "turn things around" ... and no doubt be quick to take credit if the direction of that "turn around" is negative.


Household income up, poverty level falls in Colorado - Denver Business Journal:
Tuesday, August 26, 2008 - 9:11 AM MDT
Household income up, poverty level falls in Colorado
Denver Business Journal

The median household income of Colorado residents has increased by more than 8 percent since 2004, or four times the national average.

The U.S. Census Bureau on Tuesday reported the median income in Colorado has risen to $59,209 (based on a two-year average from 2006-07) from $54,719 (based on a two-year average from 2004-2005).

The 8.2 percent increase is considered statistically significant, according to the Census Bureau.

Nationally, the median income rose by 2 percent during the same period, to $49,901 from $48,934.

During the same period, the percentage of Coloradans -— and Americans as a whole — living in poverty dipped. A family of four earning less than $21,203 a year is considered to be living in poverty.

The percentage of Coloradans in poverty dropped to 9.8 percent during the 2006-07 period from 10.7 percent in 2004-05. Nationally, the poverty figure fell to 12.4 percent from 12.7 percent.

A Fair Summary of Ted Kennedy

Power Line: What To Make of Teddy K?

The Power Line guys cover him perfectly and SUCCINCTLY in my book. I need to work hard on the succinct part!

Monday, August 25, 2008

When the Worst Happens

Not a lot of blog entries lately. Life was very busy, then it compressed to a single focus. In the waning hours of Friday August 15th, our 17 year old niece and her boyfriend were "T-boned" at a gravel intersection in IA. The driver of the 1-ton pickup that hit their little car, is also 17, apparently had been drinking, and ran a stop sign. Her boyfriend was dead at the scene and she was choppered to a trauma center.

We got the call about 3AM Saturday, packed up the family and headed the 5 hours to the hospital. The initial reports were especially grim--not much chance, bleeding from her ear, probably massive brain injury. The next reports were very hopeful, bleeding due to broken jaw, CAT scans looked OK, maybe just a concussion. Shortly after we got there, there was bad news again--her brain had "twisted" and there was damage, but the damage could not be diagnosed. We had to just watch and pray.

A long day at the hospital that Saturday. Lots of emotions-sadness, prayer, hope, despair and even laughter of memories at times. She seemed stable, it looked like a "long haul", we packed up our two boys and headed home, they had work, band camp and other things to do. We recovered some Sunday, worked Monday, and then headed back so that we could cover for her folks at the hospital as they went home for her boyfriends funeral. When we got there, she had been stable and low cranial pressure all day.

Modern life is often about finding out about things you had no idea about. "Cranial pressure" is one of those things. We tend to run about "6" normally, but by bearing down to lift something heavy, we can hit 50-60 for short periods. With a brain injury, "20" is the threshold where treatment is needed. Specific drugs will lower the pressure, but like all drugs, they have trade-offs. They are a short term fix. She went up to 36 Monday night, but the nurse was able to bring her back down under 20. The folks stayed back at home that night and were able to be at her boyfriends funeral Tuesday.

She had surgery on her jaw Tuesday, which went very well. The brain surgeon came in and said that he was optimistic since her pressure was down below 10 and it had always dropped quickly when it went up. He felt that the medical team was "chasing their tail" because of the probe reading the pressures and wanted it taken out. He felt that she was going to "wake up soon". We were elated.

The parents came back in the late afternoon, we conveyed the good news, and they felt her squeeze both of their hands that evening. We were beyond elated, we were ECSTATIC! The storm had been weathered, she was coming back to us. We got together for beers and snacks in the hotel bar that night and didn't want to leave each other. We clung, we laughed, we were relieved. I hope I learned something significant that I can carry on for the rest of my life that night.

You see, in the back of my mind, I ALWAYS doubt (you may pick that up from this blog). If things seem "better", I always wonder. Did they REALLY feel a squeeze? The "dark side" of doubt is never far away from me. It is VERY hard for me to enjoy things that are "still in doubt"--and if we are honest at all, when are most of the earthly important things NOT in doubt? I'm too prone to live my whole life watching, planning, analyzing, studying, intellectualizing and comparing and miss my life while I'm at it. Of course, I've analyzed that too a long time ago--so I try to take that tendency into a account and compensate as well. Like wearing glasses and watching our diet, we can make some level of improvement, but our natural tendencies are never very far away.

I'm so thankful that we had Tuesday night. The stress had been great enough to that point, and the desire for hope was so great that even doubting me gave in and believed. I need that lesson as I look at the abyss-- I so much want to believe, I pray to believe, but like Thomas in the bible I would REALLY like to "touch the saviors wound". Faith in the unseen is always hard for humans--on the other hand, it is what we all have for the next second and the next breath, it is just that we usually don't think about that, so it is the easy form of faith, sometimes called ignorance--and bliss.

We got up early Wednesday to head back home. We stopped up to check on her and her pressure was back up around 30, but they didn't seem panicked about it and since the brain surgeon had indicated that she may just run high, we still felt optimistic and still took off. Three hours later we got that sort of call that makes your guts turn to fiery lead. The pressure had continued to rise. The brain surgeon had been in there and said that this many days post accident it was a very bad sign. They were trying more heroic measures to get it back down, pushing her blood pressure up to try to keep blood going into the brain at even the high cranial pressures. It looked very bad, we turned around and had the longest three hour drive of our lives back to the hospital thinking the "she is gone" call would come at any second.

It was a quiet and sad day. The odds hadn't dropped to zero, but they were under 30% of a decent recovery and falling. Our niece had been a friendly, happy and chubby little girl that had blossomed into a stunning blond cheerleader, superstar on her dance squad, national honor society, and most outgoing and loving "down to earth" girl you could ever meet. Her megawatt smile lit the world around her. We all knew the realities of brain injuries--along with the very real odds of losing her completely were the also high odds of her not having anything for a life. We slipped into saying "was" associated with her name--caught ourselves and were embarrassed, but sadly knew why we were doing it.

The day wore on. She stabilized some, but before we headed to the hotel around midnight, her pressure was up to 80. We knew that was very bad, but at the levels of sleep deprivation we were all at, we still turned in for some sleep and mostly got a little. The call came at 3 and we rushed back over. Her brain stem had ruptured into the spinal column. She was gone, although still on life support for potential organ donation. They had ran her oxygen levels high, shut off the ventilator and waited 10 min to see if there was enough lower level brain function for her to take a breath. There wasn't.

The worst had happened, she was gone.

Numbness, sobbing, disbelief, anger, extreme sadness, clinging to those around us. Death is the giant fact of human life that will always be beyond our physical selves to grasp. Is there more? Will my loved ones and I have our next breath? Nobody in the physical realm really knows anything in the sense that we at least "believe that we know" that repeatable scientific things will "always" be repeatable. Of course, if we are honest about that, we know that the "error of induction" is always a potential. What we think are "stable local conditions" may be some quantum or other dimensional "bubble" that could pop like soap suds in the next second and all our logic, equations and "knowledge" will be as imaginary as the most wispy fairy tale of youth.

We love to think we are "wise, spiritual, well adjusted, stable, rational, scientific, etc", but death tells us that we lack control at the ultimate level at an extreme and very personal way. We, and all those we love will surely die. We have no answers at the level of 2+2=4 and Labor Day is on the first Monday in September to the most significant--and potentially only meaningful question of our lives. Is this all there is? Is there hope for more, and if so, what is the best way to achievement of that hope?

So, 99% of the time we do what humans have done for at least thousands of years. We deny what we don't like to think about. We "change the channel". Some of us choose to believe that there is a heaven that is better than this earthly realm, and we will see our loved ones again. For me personally, that belief is comforting, but way different than "2+2=4"--there is a sense of "rightness" to it that is like seeing a young fawn with it's mother, geese flying south in the fall, the moon traversing the sky or watching waves roll into a rocky seashore. "There is something more" is at some level of feeling that is very hard to put into words, indeed, I strongly suspect that words are an impediment.

Nothing near as potentially sensible as the previous paragraphs really went through my mind for days beyond the death. We needed to get back home to share the grieving process with our sons, so we left around 8 in the morning for the long drive home. We spent the night here in our now completed new bedroom. We had been sleeping there for one week the night of the accident, so the fact that even our own bedroom didn't seem like our own bedroom made the loss of days and location more significant. If we needed one more solid reminder that material possessions and station in life means very little in the face of the truly important things, this certainly provided it.

The next evening, Friday, we went back down to Iowa to be with the parents and friends and to pick up pictures and video for the visitation and tribute. We headed back home Saturday evening and worked until after 3AM on the slide show and video. Back up at 7AM Sunday and on the road to the visitation and funeral. Those that don't believe in their being a human spirit that is beyond the physical may not have seen a beautiful dead 17 year old. The mortician did fine, but without that brimming streaming spirit radiating from those eyes and smile, it just wasn't her.

Her organs helped 11 people, including saving the life of a baby that got half her liver--had she died at the scene or not lasted those 5 days in the hospital, that would not have been possible. Our "unanswered" prayers were someone else's miracle. I believe that a major part of the wattage of that smile was an inner faith that didn't need any more "work" at 17, where mine could use a lot of patches at 51. I don't claim to have a clue of the plans of an infinitely powerful God who is beyond our material world. One of the theories of quantum computing is called the "many worlds" or "multiverse" theory, developed by a guy named Hugh Everett. Under that theory, the "quantum strangeness" isn't strange at all (or it is very strange). Every "decision" at even very small levels "forks" a completely different copy of the entire universe -- our consciousness just happens to be in one of them.

So on the path that everyone reading this blog is on, she didn't make it through the accident. On another she did, on yet another the accident never happened -- and on and on to what would seem to us to be infinity. Strange? Sure, but only about the same level of strangeness of some of the other theories of why quantum effects work as they do. I believe that strange attempted explanation is far less strange than what God is really up to, and my niece is with God laughing about the simplicity and ultimate rightness of it all at some level that is so beyond our imagining that the totality of all our earthly existences will seem of less significance than a raindrop in the ocean when we see the truth.

The memorial service at the high school on Sunday night was precious. Over a thousand people, some good music, some good words, comfort, togetherness, celebration of a life that was very well lived, but oh so short. The funeral at the very conservative church that our nieces family attended was difficult for those of us not used to that approach from youth. I was struck that in a church with no words or ornamentation, the only words visible at the front the church were on two speakers -- "Bose". No love, no hope, no truth, no peace, no faith, no joy, not even the cross or Christ. Only "Bose".

I know they mean well, and their traditions are hugely important to them, but the tone of that service was so much not my niece. Her life SHOUTED **JOY** in gigantic pink letters and she positively radiated love to people in her daily life. It was easy to see the fruits of the spirit in her. Their minister may not be able to provide assurance that our niece is with Jesus, but 10 minutes of time with her when she was alive was more than enough for a Christian not captive to the tradition, form, practice and regulations of a very unusual sect to have assurance of all the words NOT present at the front of that church.

So, now we go on. I had been saving vacation for end of the summer, and I decided that I really needed the time off, so I took it. I didn't "do" much -- read, thought, slept, caught up on the mundane things around home that had slid while we were away. Tomorrow I return to work and "normal life", although I suspect with some priority change. Will it be permanent? I have no idea -- I know way too well how strong our tendency to "return to the mean" of our lives is. In some ways, that is good -- in others, we need to change to improve. I pray that I can do that.


















Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Racist BO?

Obama on Clarence Thomas - WSJ.com

S
o let's see. By the time he was nominated, Clarence Thomas had worked in the Missouri Attorney General's office, served as an Assistant Secretary of Education, run the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and sat for a year on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation's second most prominent court. Since his "elevation" to the High Court in 1991, he has also shown himself to be a principled and scholarly jurist.

Meanwhile, as he bids to be America's Commander in Chief, Mr. Obama isn't yet four years out of the Illinois state Senate, has never held a hearing of note of his U.S. Senate subcommittee, and had an unremarkable record as both a "community organizer" and law school lecturer. Justice Thomas's judicial credentials compare favorably to Mr. Obama's Presidential résumé by any measure. And when it comes to rising from difficult circumstances, Justice Thomas's rural Georgian upbringing makes Mr. Obama's story look like easy street.

So you need less experience to be a President than a Supreme Court Justice? BO seems to think that white conservatives are preferable to black conservatives -- at least THEY are "qualified". So what IS "racist" again?

Friday, August 15, 2008

So Was Kerry an Elitist?

CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Labor organization looks to paint McCain as elitist « - Blogs from CNN.com

It is very interesting how the lefty brain thinks. I don't really mind EITHER Kerry or McCain being worth 100's of millions because they married rich ladies. I married over my head as well-I'd sure hate to have married the woman that I deserve!

I don't particularly like Kerry having 800 Million and then trying to make sure that I never get in the low single digit millions through taxes and anti-business policy, but my problem isn't that HE has the $800 million. That it just fine. Why is it OK for him to have it, but bad for me to have 1 or 2 million?

So do you suspect that this labor org thought that Kerry was "elitist"? Bush is worth a lot less than either Kerry or McCain ... I'm SURE that they must have strongly supported HIM, because I think it is pretty hard for anyone to call Bush "elitist"!!

My definition of elitist is about thought, not money. It is the contention by the MSM, hollywood, artists and many university professors that they have figured out the "truth" that is superior to what religion, history, religion or in many cases even science possesses. They are "in the know" on whatever the popular position of the day is, and to be on the other side of their vaunted views is to be part of the "unwashed masses" ... the kind of people that still "cling to religion and guns".

People with money are RARELY "elitist" ... although many leading Democrats are the exception to that rule.

Jaws Not Put off By BO?

David Kahane on Hillary Clinton on National Review Online

This one is really well done, good to see that NRO lives on with only the ghost of Buckley to help it.

Couple of teasers-but it all needs to be read to get full humor:

The trip all culminated, of course, in the great speech at the Siegessäule in Berlin (which poor New York Times columnist Bob Herbert mistook for both the Washington Monument and the Leaning Tower of Pisa), which sent 200,000 Germans into paroxysms of ecstasy not seen since Leni Riefenstahl was toting a camera. Nobody feels more like a citizen of the world than the Germans, especially when they’re hungry and don’t have time to phone ahead to Paris or Rome for
reservations.

So it was three cheers for BO Jr., and then it was off to Hawaii, where he could revisit the scenes of his youth as a poor half-black sharecropper, or a pampered half-white kid attending the tony Punahou School, or some combination of both, while a leggy Paris Hilton in a bikini was making goo-goo eyes at John McCain and proposing the most perfectly sensible energy policy anyone ever heard. Do both? Now that’s bipartisanship.
It is so sad that the "MSM humor squad" doesn't find BO and company funny. Yes, yes -- pain, pestilence, economic decline and death by terrorists will require a "sophisticated wit", but HEY, we aren't there yet! The likely future is all the more reason to enjoy the today we have to our very fullest!!

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Is BO Just an MSM Wish?

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Breaking the Press

I'm not ready to buy this yet, but BO hasn't been trouncing McCain in the polls. People DO tend to actually operate by "narratives" rather than clouds of media "facts".

My problem is that I REALLY have "left fatigue". I understand it will still be YEARS before they take an responsibility for anything (and then only because eventually they realize they HAVE TO or their isn't much reason to have them in power), even though they have now owned both houses of congress for a full "active cyle" (1.5 years ... new congress focuses on "the people's business" for the year immediately after election and most of the spring cycle of election year-they are just trying to get re-elected now).

Given the Bush weakness, they have been in the drivers seat for two years and we are starting to see results already--higher fuel prices, slumping economy, bigger deficits. Since Bush is still in the WH, the MSM is perfectly willing to blame him for everything, and no doubt will do so for at least two more years.

One nice thing though is that even moderate good news will start to be reported as such and attributed to BO / Democrats the very day he takes office. It will be nice to hear about places that jobs are increasing, drops in fuel prices, new technologies that could be hopeful for the future, etc. For someone that cares about life more than politics, good news is GOOD ... no matter who is in the WH. That will be at least one immediate good thing of BO in the WH.

But if McCain should win, the negativity will certainly get completely out of hand as if it hasn't already!

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

The Galbraith Effect

RealClearPolitics - Articles - The Galbraith Effect?

Thomas Sowell is a very intelligent man that also happens to be black. He talks about John Kenneth Galbraith giving a blow-away superb lecture to open a semester, but then how he just kept giving that very same, very general lecture, and the students drifted away. Could that be the case for BO?

Essentially, all BO ever had was "one great speech". Hope-change-future-new-not Bush-end the war. Popular with a whole bunch of folks, especially on the left, but there never has been any "there there". Yes, "soaking the rich" sounds like fun to many, but it is "fun" like killing the golden goose is fun. It tends to be a very short lived variety of fun.

BO doesn't care about this unless it hurts his election chances, so he and the MSM will push like crazy to be sure that he gets elected. BUT, the polls don't seem to be following what the MSM would expect for the "perfect candidate with all the money".

Maybe voters don't actually like the prospect of a true empty suit in the White House when it is still a very dangerous world without any gaurentees of future economic or other success.

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Democrats and Sex

Power Line: What goes around. . .

I suspect that very few liberals and Democrats actually have any fixed opinions on sexual morality. On one hand they want to go out of their way to criminalize at least heterosexual interactions in the work area, on the other hand, when one of their own (Clinton for example) is accused, they see that as "unimportant".

Here is my "guess" at what they may generally believe:
  • Whatever a Democrat does sexually is just fine. If they "get caught", the media and other Democrats ought to ignore it as much as possible for as long as possible.
  • Anything even related to sex for a Republican (as in Limbaugh/Viagra) ought to be "outed" in whatever form possible as early as possible with an indication of "hypocrisy". Since Republicans claim to have moral standards on issues like trust, truth, honesty, etc, ANY evidence that they are "less than perfect" is completely fair game. (BTW, they need not even be "elected" ... Bill Bennett was a juicy target on his gambling even though he was no longer holding any public office).
  • Sexual harassment is a weapon to be used on Republicans (Clarence Thomas, Bob Packwood, etc), but "forgiven" in Democrats (Bill Clinton).
  • Same sex activity is another anti-Republican weapon -- Foley / Craig lately, course it is fine for Democrats, Frank / Gary Studds. One of the KEYS to being a liberal is that INconsistency is a VIRTUE!



Monday, August 11, 2008

Iraq Budget Surplus?

Why do we have such a hard time hearing good news from Baghdad? - By Christopher Hitchens - Slate Magazine

I'm starting to think that Slate has folks that realize that even if one has a liberal bent, being reality based can be a good thing. The link to the NYT story is amazing, one would think that it was BAD news that Iraq has a budget surplus, they are selling oil, and their gravediggers are unemployed! Well, I suppose if less than a year ago you were reporting with confidence that the surge was a failure, Iraq was in civil war, and the situation was militarily hopeless, and it REALLY was more important for you to be "right" than for millions of people to be saved from murder and the US to be spared a terrorist base worse than Afghanistan ever was, then I guess it would be "bad news".

I especially liked this paragraph:

It is in no spirit of revenge that I remind you that, as little as a
year ago, the whole of smart liberal opinion believed that the
dissolution of Baathism and militarism had been a mistake, that Iraq
itself was a bottomless pit of wasted dollars and pointless casualties,
and that the only option was to withdraw as fast as possible and let
the inevitable civil war burn itself out. To the left of that liberal
consensus, people of the caliber and quality of Michael Moore were describing
the nihilist "insurgents" as the moral equivalent of the Minutemen, and
to the right of the same consensus, people like Pat Buchanan were
hinting that we had been cheated into the whole enterprise by a certain
minority whose collective name began with the letter J.

Don't expect most liberals to do any navel gazing about how they might have been wrong and what it might say about them to feel bad as lives are saved and US safety is obviously improved. There is NOTHING more important to a liberal than believing that they are intellectually superior, so it just isn't going to happen.

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Last Word On Edwards

Power Line: My last word on the Edwards affair

I like the way the Power Line guys closed this one out, and I hope the rest of the conservative bloggers and media do the same. Edwards has come out and admitted his affair and admitted the damage that he did. He DID NOT break any laws, he has been brought low by human frailty, he admitted it, NOW it is time to move on.

Contrast that with Clinton, he LIED UNDER OATH in a sexual harrassment case!!! He NEVER admitted he lied under oath, because that was clearly perjury and one would assume that he would HAVE to be removed from office. The fact that he was not removed from office shows that the US is biased for the left and against the right ... or more precisely that the people on the right enforce their values even when the enforcement has to happen on one of their own, where the left does not.

Contrast that with Teddy Kennedy who has NEVER come clean on what really happened at Chappaquiddick. Again, the people of Massachusets have failed to remove a stain from the US Senate for reasons that are very hard to fathom and make one strongly question the ability of our system to operate with justice.

There is no need at all to behave like liberals and kick a man when he is down and I applaud Power Line!

Saturday, August 09, 2008

Friday, August 08, 2008

More BO Street Cred

Power Line: Astounding Things, Indeed!

BO here declares how good a friend he is of the great Detroit Mayor, Kwame Kilpatrick. Good buddy Kwame is in jail today after violating his extremely generous bond restrictions and assaulting a sheriff's deputy. Naturally, the mayor of a major US city being in jail isn't getting a lot of coverage in the MSM - oh, not that one really needs to mention it, given his name and DETROIT, but he is a DEMOCRAT. I know the MSM isn't biased, so I'm certain that if a Republican mayor was in jail, they would treat it EXACTLY the same!

Uh Who Did He Theaten?

CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - New Details: Man held for alleged Obama assassination threat « - Blogs from CNN.com


So the reason that they arrested him is because he said ""if he gets elected, I'll assassinate him myself." ... but wouldn't BO have to be elected first for that to be a real threat?

On the other hand:

A classmate said that, one day after class, she also heard Geisel say
"that he hated George W. Bush and that he wanted to put a bullet in the
president's head."

Now, I know the MSM hates Bush a lot and feels that BO is as good as elected, but why is it that the headline says "Obama assassination threat" when the guy directly threatened the current president? Is that what one would call "factual reporting"?

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Video Messiah

Ann On John Edwards Media Disappearance

The MSM always is long on excuses for why they have to cover any little rumor or innuendo about a Republican, there usual claim is "hypocrisy". They are very right on that, many liberals never claimed to have any morals on anything, so no matter WHAT they do (except maybe pray or accidently tell the truth at times) you can't really say they are hypocrites!

BUT, it sure looks like Edwards went out on a limb on faithfulness to his wife here ... it seems that if it is "hypocrisy" that they REALLY have to cover, rather than just the actual "he had an R next to his name", they would HAVE to cover Edwards. This is John coming back to a question from Katie Couric on if voters ought to care if a presidential candidate is faithful to his spouse:

"Of course. I mean, for a lot of Americans -- including the family that I grew up with, I mean, it's fundamental to how you judge people and human character -- whether you keep your word, whether you keep what is your ultimate word, which is that you love your spouse, and you'll stay with them. ... I think the most important qualities in a president in today's world are trustworthiness -- sincerity, honesty, strength of leadership. And -- and certainly that goes to a part of that."
So there you have it. Since Edwards is a liberal, he subscribes to the "perfectibility of man", and there we see the flower of that philosophy. When man decides "what is moral", then each man is usurps the role of God and we have millions of little gods in a headlong rush to see who can be the 'biggest", while in truth, they are really fighting to dig to the deepest depths possible-they just don't realize it.

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

The Goracle Goes to Sea

Pajamas Media » Gore Hits the Waves with a Massive New Houseboat

If it was possible for leftys to be hypocrites, the Goracle would be hard to beat. We have covered his mammoth polluting home and his constant use of private jets, but isn't a 100' houseboat with a jet ski on the back just REALLY thumbing his nose at the complete rubes that believe his global warming bull?

Unless the guy is just plain stark raving howl at the moon looney, if he ACTUALLY beleived in all this planetary crisis crap, it seems IMPOSSIBLE that he would enjoy riding around is this monster!! I mean **I WOULD**, but I'm not writing books and making movies claiming that our planet is on it's last legs and we all ought to be living in the dark without heat or air conditioning (well, I guess just air ... it will be too hot to need heat if we believe Al)

Come on, isn't the jig up for this guy SOMETIME??? Isn't it obvious that he is just riding the "green gravy train" for all it is worth??? What is the difference between this and Tammy and Jim Baker of PTL fame rolling in the donations and then putting up the $10K dog house? Not a lot that I can see.

Time Fails to Cover BO

Power Line: Time Tries to Salvage Obama's Gaffe

I expected the PL guys would be back to refute Time's lame attempt to "pump up" their pressure and mathematics "differently abled" candidate. They didn't disappoint.

The core reason that Time's defense fails HUGELY is that neither they or BO consider the 1 TRILLION known US reserves in oil shale. It takes $80 oil to make that worthwhile, but in case Time and BO failed to notice, $120 is greater than $80.

I'm SURE that his royal highness BO, he with the total lack of ego will be MORE than willing to simply say "I was wrong", unlike that evil Bush. I'm just waiting for that, and it isn't like he hasn't had opportunity!

Here are a few that he could get started on. It will probably takes us 6 months into a BO administration to get the "Scent of BO Calendar" going, but it could be a good one!

  • I was wrong about the 10K dead in a small town in Kansas! (real number 12)
  • I was wrong about 57 states with 2 to go ( real number of states 50 ... God only knows how many BO had really been to)
  • I was wrong about Iran being "just a tiny country". (70 million people, 500K army, active nuke program, sits on major oil reserves ... and a whole lot more)
  • I was wrong about the Surge (said it would make Iraq situation worse, it did the opposite big time)
  • I was wrong about tire pressure saving more fuel than we could develop domestically. ( 90 million in unlikely theory from tire pressure per year, total known domestic oil reserves counting oil shale (viable at $80 oil) 1 Trillion plus barrels ... takes 11 thousand years of tire pressure to equal our known domestic reserves)
... to be continued and continued ...